2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic costs of heat-induced reductions in worker productivity due to global warming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Orlov et al 31 project a decrease in work productivity of approximately 9.5% and 12% for South Asia and Southeast Asia respectively, in the crops sector by 2050 under the CMIP5 high-emission scenario (their figure 9). Assuming this corresponds to 2 C of warming relative to the present gives an impact gradient of 4.7 and 6.0 %/C respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orlov et al 31 project a decrease in work productivity of approximately 9.5% and 12% for South Asia and Southeast Asia respectively, in the crops sector by 2050 under the CMIP5 high-emission scenario (their figure 9). Assuming this corresponds to 2 C of warming relative to the present gives an impact gradient of 4.7 and 6.0 %/C respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively assess the impact of heat stress under climate change on China's labor productivity and the resulting economic impact, we adopt an interdisciplinary theoretical framework (Figure 1) (Orlov et al., 2020; Takakura et al., 2018): Projections of climate variables are used to calculate the WBGT of each grid (0.5° × 0.5°) in China (Section 2.2). Then, WBGTs are introduced into expose‐response functions to quantify the impact of heat stress on labor productivity (Section 2.3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology employed by early studies is idealistic, but these studies confirm the dominant position of changes in labor productivity in economic impact assessments considering climate change (DARA, 2012; Roson & Sartori, 2016). Researchers continue to improve the methodology used in these assessments by distinguishing work intensity (Kjellstrom et al., 2016), including the socioeconomic conditions (Takakura et al., 2017) and considering climate change adaptations (Morabito et al., 2020; Orlov et al., 2020; Takakura et al., 2018) into the estimates. However, economic impact assessments of heat‐related changes in labor productivity under climate change are still in the early stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them are low and high temperatures, seasonal labour intensity, precipitation, intense solar radiation, etc. The authors A. Orlov, J. Sillmann, K. Aunan, T. Kjellstrom, A. Aaheim in their study provide data on the economic costs of implementing health and safety recommendations in combating heat stress of workers, which reduce global GDP by 2.4% [13]. These results confirm the global scale and significance of the problems of ensuring safe working conditions in the agricultural sector [14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%