Ecology and identity of mycelia isolated from soil

Warcup, J.H.; Talbot, P. H. B.

doi:10.1016/s0007-1536(62)80010-2

Cited by 72 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…and Galz.) B. and G. (Warcup and Talbot, 1962) has there ever been any irregularity in basidial form which could support Parker-Rhodes's (1954) suggestion that the latter may be a form of Ceratobasidium calosporuni Rogers. Branching and ad\ entitious septation of the spicula in Tulasnella calospora have apparently not been noted before.…”

Section: Nom Ananisupporting

confidence: 52%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perfect States of Rhizoctonias Associated With Orchids

Warcup¹,

Talbot²

1967

New Phytologist

201

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYRhizoctoma isolates obtained from terrestrial orchids in South Australia and Great Britain have been induced to fruit in culture. The perfect states thus obtained belong to Thanatephortis cucitmeris (Frank) Donk, T. sterigmaticus (Bourdot) Talbot, T. orchidicola Warcup and Talbot, Ceratobasidiinn cornigerum (Bourdot) Rogers, C. obscurum Rogers, Ceratobasidium sp. indet., Tulasnella calospora (Boudier) Juel, T. asymmetrica sp. nov., Tulasnella sp. indet. and Sebacina lermifera Oberwinkler. Tulasnelta calospora was found to be the perfect state of three cultures considered to be Rhizoctonia repeiis Bernard. The status of the orchid-fungus association is discussed.

show abstract

Section: Nom Ananisupporting

confidence: 52%

“…The main method used to induce fruiting of Rhizoctonia isolates was the soil-on-agar culture method (Stretton et al, 1964;Warcup and Talbot, 1965). Urrbrae clay was the main 'casing soil' used.…”

Section: I2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perfect States of Rhizoctonias Associated With Orchids

Warcup¹,

Talbot²

1967

New Phytologist

201

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In. basidia induction tests, three binucleate isolates (1 Ag C and 2 unassigned Ag) produced a teleomorphic state which resembled that of Ceratobasidium eornigerum (Bourd) Rogers (1935) as described by Warcup and Talbot (1962) and the Ceratobasidium sp. described by Parmeter et al (1967).…”

Section: Anastomosis Groupingmentioning

confidence: 79%

Identity and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. associated with bare patch disease of cereals at a field site in Western Australia

Roberts

Sivasithamparam

1986

Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Roots of seedlings of wheat and barley affected by bare patch disease at a field site in Western Australia were assessed for root damage and plated to isolate fungi. The patches were variable in shape and size and had the most severely affected plants in the centre. Of the 165 isolates of Rhizoctonia spp. obtained, 90% were multinucleate and 10% binucleate, the former being predominant in the plants at the centre of the patch. The relative frequency of binucleate isolates increased with proximity to the periphery. The increase in activity of avirulent binucleate isolates towards the periphery of the patch may be related to the sharp and abrupt edging of the patch. A variety of other species of fungi such as Fusarium spp., Mortierella spp., Bipolaris sorokiniana, Pythium sp. and Trichoderma sp. were encountered within the patches. The multinucleate isolates belonging to anastomosis groups (Ag) 2-1, 2-2 and 8 (Thanatephorus cucumeris) were most pathogenic to wheat. The binucleate isolates of Ag C, D, E, and K (Ceratobasidiurn sp.) were less pathogenic. It is suggested that the bare patch disease is caused by a complex of root rot fungi composed of one or more anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia spp. and other associated fungi.

show abstract

“…Communities of microfungi cannot be studied directly in the field by inventories of sporocarps. Warcup and Talbot 1962), but they are not yet very successful. Many different techniques and culture media are in use (see chapter 7.3).…”

Section: Methodological Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The analysis and classification of fungal communities with special reference to macrofungi

Arnolds¹

1992

Fungi in Vegetation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter treats the various approaches, methods and terms, used for the study of fungal communities in general, and communities of macrofungi in particular. The morphological, taxonomic, ecological and methodological differences between macro-and microfungi are discussed. Communities of macrofungi are studied in different ways, using mycocoenological, mycosynusial, mycofioristic-ecological, phytocoenological and geographical approaches, which are concisely treated. The status of fungal communities, mycocoenoses and mycosocieties is discussed, as well as the related terminology. Attention is paid to the different degrees of dependence of fungi on other organisms and to the consequences for analysis and classification of mycocoenoses. The criteria for the selection of sample plots, viz. uniformity, size and representativity, are reviewed. The more important methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis of mycocoenoses are presented, as well as methods for the synthesis of these data in relation to frequency and duration of mycocoenologic.al analysis. Finally, the different approaches to classification of mycocoenoses are critically considered.2.

show abstract

Ecology and identity of mycelia isolated from soil

Cited by 72 publications

References 13 publications

Perfect States of Rhizoctonias Associated With Orchids

Perfect States of Rhizoctonias Associated With Orchids

Identity and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. associated with bare patch disease of cereals at a field site in Western Australia

The analysis and classification of fungal communities with special reference to macrofungi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About