2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2013.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG beat classification using PCA, LDA, ICA and Discrete Wavelet Transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
280
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
280
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, selection of significant features plays a vital role in the classification, particularly when the ECG data is noisy. Current reduction/optimization methods to solve the feature reduction problem in ECG classification include Genetic Algorithm (GA) with Support Vector Machine (SVM) [5], Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with SVM, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) with SVM [6], Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) with Neural Network (NN) [7], Firefly and Particle Swarm Optimization (FFPSO) technique with Levenberg Marquardt Neural Network (LMNN) [8]. Existing methods were tested on noise-free ECG data, which produced accurate classification results [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, selection of significant features plays a vital role in the classification, particularly when the ECG data is noisy. Current reduction/optimization methods to solve the feature reduction problem in ECG classification include Genetic Algorithm (GA) with Support Vector Machine (SVM) [5], Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with SVM, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) with SVM [6], Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) with Neural Network (NN) [7], Firefly and Particle Swarm Optimization (FFPSO) technique with Levenberg Marquardt Neural Network (LMNN) [8]. Existing methods were tested on noise-free ECG data, which produced accurate classification results [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in the last years, several PVC detection system have been proposed for this issue: based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (Bortolan et al, 1991;Dalvi et al, 2016;Hu et al, 1997;Inan et al, 2006), Heuristic algorithm (Dotsinsky and Stoyanov, 2004), Bayesian framework (Sayadi et al, 2010), Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Shen et al, 2011), morphology ECG features (Chazal and Reilly, 2006;Chazal et al, 2004;Lek-uthai et al, 2014), Fuzzy Neural Network System (FNNS) (Lim, 2009), Wavelet Transform (Inan et al, 2006;Martis et al, 2013;Nazarahari et al, 2015;Orozco-Duque et al, 2013;Shyu et al, 2004;Yochum et al, 2016) and adaptive filter (Nieminaki et al, 1999;Solosenko et al, 2015). The main feature of most detection methods is a real-time analysis, however some methods have high mathematical complexity, which demands a high computational cost.…”
Section: Real-time Premature Ventricular Contractions Detection Basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a j yaklaşım katsayıları ve d j detay katsayıları denklem (2)'deki gibi hesaplanır [21]. (2) ADD analizinde, orijinal sinyal birbirini tamamlayan alçak ve yüksek geçiren iki filtre yoluyla eşit olarak alçak ve yüksek frekanslı bileşenlere ayrılır [22,23]. Alçak geçiren filtre yöntemiyle işlenen sinyalden elde edilen yüksek ölçekli düşük frekanslı yeniden oluşturma bileşenine yaklaşım adı verilmekte ve "A" harfi ile gösterilmektedir.…”
Section: Marmara Fenunclassified