2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00759.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early season height differences as robust predictors of weed growth potential in maize: new avenues for adaptive management?

Abstract: McDonald AJ, Riha SJ & Ditommaso A (2010). Early season height differences as robust predictors of weed growth potential in maize: new avenues for adaptive management? Weed Research50, 110–119. Summary Weed interference in annual cropping systems can be highly variable from year‐to‐year, as well as spatially heterogeneous. These factors have confounded efforts to develop simple methods for predicting competitive outcomes early in the growing season. A 2‐year study was conducted with maize in competition with f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, beet yield was accurately predicted by the relative leaf area of Chenopodium album measured 30 days after weed emergence (Kropff & Spitters, 1991). Recently, the difference in plant height among weed and crop plants assessed soon after weed emergence was related to the intensity of competition and crop yield and also to the reproductive performance of weeds (McDonald et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Effect Traits and Agro‐ecosystem Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, beet yield was accurately predicted by the relative leaf area of Chenopodium album measured 30 days after weed emergence (Kropff & Spitters, 1991). Recently, the difference in plant height among weed and crop plants assessed soon after weed emergence was related to the intensity of competition and crop yield and also to the reproductive performance of weeds (McDonald et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Effect Traits and Agro‐ecosystem Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2006). Although simple to parameterise and ecologically sound, these models lack accuracy, because demographical changes of weeds are not taken into account (but see McDonald et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Effect Traits and Agro‐ecosystem Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have described the outcome of crop–weed competition and determined the importance of timing of weed emergence relative to the crop as a key variable influencing crop yield loss (Kropff & Spitters, 1991; Knezevic et al. , 1994; Bosnić & Swanton, 1997; McDonald et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to differences in competitive response of weed individuals to crop competition. Polygonum persicaria is known to be a shade‐tolerant species (Griffith & Sultan, ), while C. album presents an erect growth habit allowing an overtopping strategy of the crop canopy in several crop types (McDonald et al ., ). Our study confirmed these results and additionally showed idiosyncratic patterns of ‘trait–environment’ relationships for these weeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%