Early orthodontic intervention

White, Larry W.

doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70273-2

Cited by 38 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Every advocator of the different myofunctional appliances has considered more or less his own theory and working hypothesis: Andresen, Haupl, and Herren for the activator, Balters for the bionator, Rolf Frankel for the functional regulator, and Clark for the Twin Block. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Functional appliances work in two ways: Either force application or force elimination. The new pattern of function using myofunctional appliances develops a new morphological prototype.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Tailored Approach for Growth Modification: An Innovative Approach

Kamble¹,

Sharma²,

Shrivastav³

et al. 2017

World Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment effects of the clear block appliance during comprehensive correction of class II malocclusion in growing patients.Introduction: Sagittal discrepancy commonly exists in skeletal class II malocclusions. The popular of the class II malocclusions is division 1 type among them. The presence of original skeletal jaw abnormality is the origin of the class II malocclusions. The treatment result of such skeletal malocclusion depends on the age, latent growth, and cooperation of the individual. The class II division 1 malocclusion in a growing individual can be successfully treated with different types of myofunctional appliance. The present article illustrates a new approach (clear block appliance) to correct sagittal discrepancy to make optimal use of the patient's pubertal growth spurt to achieve best possible results. Based on the results in these patients, the clear block appliance was very effective in correcting class II malocclusions. Although the results are positive, they should be tested on a large sample size.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Tailored Approach for Growth Modification: An Innovative Approach

Kamble¹,

Sharma²,

Shrivastav³

et al. 2017

World Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En effet, l'insuffisance de largeur maxillaire, à la fois au niveau occlusal et au niveau squelettique, est un aspect majeur d'une malocclusion de classe II en évo-lution [1] : un patient en classe II en denture mixte présente généralement un décalage transversal de 3-5 mm entre le maxillaire et la mandibule. Un second objectif légitime d'intervention précoce chez les sujets présentant une classe II est la correction d'une proalvéolie maxillaire avec diastème, qui peut conduire à une majoration du risque traumatique pour les incisives [18]. En revanche, le traitement destiné à induire une réponse squelettique au niveau A.B 14 ans 8 mois de la mandibule, par appareil fonctionnel ou par tout autre dispositif visant un objectif thérapeutique similaire, devra, pour sa part, être reporté au début du pic de croissance pubertaire.…”

Section: Remarques Finalesunclassified

Malocclusions de classe II : bien choisir le moment du traitement pour optimiser l’effet orthopédique des appareils fonctionnels

Baccetti¹

2010

Orthod Fr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Le temps peut être considéré comme la quatrième dimension en orthopédie dento-faciale. Le moment du traitement peut en effet influencer de façon significative les résultats des thérapeutiques visant à produire un effet orthopédique sur les structures cranio-faciales. Des études céphalométriques, anciennes et récentes, toutes solides sur le plan méthodologique, indiquent clairement que le moment optimal pour le traitement des décalages squelettiques de classe II à l’aide d’un appareil fonctionnel (par exemple, le twin block) se situe pendant ou légèrement après le pic de croissance mandibulaire. Ce dernier peut être mis en évidence par un indicateur biologique de maturité squelettique individuelle fiable, tel que la méthode de la maturation vertébrale cervicale.

show abstract

“…12 This allows the permanent teeth to erupt into a better position and improves the dental aesthetics.…”

Section: Management Of Pseudo-class III Malocclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At this stage of development it is possible to correct an isolated problem or provide preliminary treatment. 12,13 Anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition should be corrected to allow normal dental development and subsequent favourable skeletal growth.…”

Section: Use Of Bionator In Pseudo-class III Malocclusion In Mixed Dementioning

confidence: 99%

Pseudo-Class III malocclusion treatment with Balters’ Bionator

Giancotti

Maselli

Mampieri

et al. 2003

Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this article is to show the use of the Balters' Bionator in pseudo-Class III treatment. The importance of differentiating between true Class III and pseudo-Class III is emphasized. The therapeutic results of a Balters' Bionator appliance are presented in three case reports of subjects in the mixed dentition. In this stage of development it is possible to correct an isolated problem. The use of the Bionator III in this kind of malocclusion enabled the correction of a dental malocclusion in a few months and therapeutic stability of a mesially-positioned mandible encouraging favourable skeletal growth.

show abstract

Early orthodontic intervention

Cited by 38 publications

References 7 publications

A Tailored Approach for Growth Modification: An Innovative Approach

A Tailored Approach for Growth Modification: An Innovative Approach

Malocclusions de classe II : bien choisir le moment du traitement pour optimiser l’effet orthopédique des appareils fonctionnels

Pseudo-Class III malocclusion treatment with Balters’ Bionator

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About