Early detection of cervical cancer based on high‐risk HPV DNA‐based genosensors: A systematic review

Abstract

Human papillomavirus type (HPV) is a common cause of sexually transmitted disease (STD) in humans. HPV types 16 and 18 as the highest risk types are related with gynecologic malignancy and cervical cancer (CC) among women worldwide. Recently, considerable development of genosensors, which allows dynamic monitoring of hybridization events for HPV‐16 and 18, has been a topic of focus by many researchers. In this systematic review, we highlight the route of development of DNA‐based genosensory detection methods for diagnosis of high risk of HPV precancer. Biosensor detection methods of HPV‐16 and 18 was investigated from 1994 to 2018 using several databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholar, SID, and Scientific Information Database. Manual search of references of retrieved articles were also performed. A total of 50 studies were reviewed. By analyzing the most recent developed electrochemical biosensors for the identification of HPV, we observed that the sensor platform fabricated by Wang et al. holds the lowest detection limit reported in the literature for the DNA of HPV‐16. Up to this date, optical, electrochemical, and piezoelectric systems are the main transducers used in the development of biosensors. Among the most sensitive techniques available to study the biorecognition activity of the sensors, we highlight the biosensors based fluorescent, EIS, and QCM. The current systematic review focuses on the sensory diagnostic methods that are being used to detect HPV‐16 and 18 worldwide. Special emphasis is given on the sensory techniques that can diagnosis the individuals with CC. © 2018 BioFactors, 45(2):101–117, 2019

The overview and perspectives of biosensors and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A systematic review

“…In electrochemical biosensors, a solid electrode acts as the basic electrode to transmit the signal throughout the detection process, converting the produced signal into electrical signals, including current, potential, impedance, and coulometry signals (Abraham et al, 2015; Ahmadzadeh, Rezayi, Faghih‐Mirzaei, Yoosefian, & Kassim, 2015; Ahmadzadeh, Rezayi, Kassim, & Aghasi, 2015; Rezayi, Karazhian, et al, 2014; Rezayi, Gholami, Said, & Alias, 2016; Said et al, 2015). Due to the various biological targets of M. tb detection, the reported electrochemical biosensors for M. tb diagnosis have been divided into two categories of electrochemical DNA and immune biosensors (Fani et al, 2018; Mahmoodi et al, 2019; Rasouli et al, 2018; Rezayi, Farjami, Hosseini, Ebrahimi, & Abouzari‐Lotf, 2018). Electrochemical biosensors (especially electrochemical DNA biosensors) have the most common application for the detection of infectious agents, such as M. tb (Huang, Xu, Liu, Wang, & Chen, 2017; Ronkainen, Halsall, & Heineman, 2010).…”

A Review of Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Biosensor Materials for Detection of COVID‐19 and Other Viruses

“…Given the prevalence of this virus, researchers focus on developing effective monitoring methods for high-risk HPV communities. [63] To identify the HPV in recurrent and original pathological biopsy samples, Fu et al [64] used AT-cut 10 MHz piezoelectric quartz crystal and fabricated piezoelectric genesensors. A method for the rapid detection of HPV using piezoelectric genesensors was developed, and the detection effectiveness was compared with those of conventional PCR-dot blot hybridizations.…”

Exosomes: New insights into cancer mechanisms

“…[19][20][21][22] Moreover, exosomes could be loaded with circular-RNAs (circRNAs) 23 and long noncoding RNAs that are stable in this extracellular vesicles. [19][20][21][22] Moreover, exosomes could be loaded with circular-RNAs (circRNAs) 23 and long noncoding RNAs that are stable in this extracellular vesicles.…”