2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of spin torque switching in all-perpendicular spin valve nanopillars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both effects are entirely of dynamical nature, and their influence on the phase boundaries can be theoretically described using the formalism developed in Ref. [16]. Renormalization of the effective dynamic time allows one to link dependence between the critical current, pulse width, and finite temperature.…”
Section: Macrospin Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both effects are entirely of dynamical nature, and their influence on the phase boundaries can be theoretically described using the formalism developed in Ref. [16]. Renormalization of the effective dynamic time allows one to link dependence between the critical current, pulse width, and finite temperature.…”
Section: Macrospin Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of thermal fluctuations leads to a strong dependence of the critical current on pulse length. Note that thermal activation can be included in a macrospin calculation [10,[25][26][27]. iii) for magnetic elements with dimensions large enough to accomodate a domain wall, the reversal process can be driven by domain nucleation and propagation further reducing the energy barrier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinna et al 13 reported that, in a system with uniaxial anisotropy, n = 2 is a much better fit to the data at long time scales than n = 1, and the crossover regime between deterministic and thermal effects could span very large switching timescales. However, Liu et al 14 used n = 1 following the effective temperature argument, while Thomas et al 15 argued that n = 1 provides a better fit to their experimental data than n = 2. Fitting experimental data with equations (3) and (4) using n = 1 or n = 2 leads to large discrepancies in the values of ∆ as discussed below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%