2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of evapotranspiration partitioning in a semi-arid forest as affected by temporal rainfall patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
99
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S3). A similar pattern was previously reported in forests in water-limited regions (Helman et al, 2017b;Raz-Yaseef et al, 2012;Williams et al, 2012). ET higher than rainwater supply indicates that trees use water stored in deep soil layers during wet years in the subsequent dry years (e.g., 2006 andRaz-Yaseef et al, 2012;Barbeta et al, 2015).…”
Section: Annual-basis Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S3). A similar pattern was previously reported in forests in water-limited regions (Helman et al, 2017b;Raz-Yaseef et al, 2012;Williams et al, 2012). ET higher than rainwater supply indicates that trees use water stored in deep soil layers during wet years in the subsequent dry years (e.g., 2006 andRaz-Yaseef et al, 2012;Barbeta et al, 2015).…”
Section: Annual-basis Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A similar pattern was previously reported in forests in water-limited regions (Helman et al, 2017b;Raz-Yaseef et al, 2012;Williams et al, 2012). ET higher than rainwater supply indicates that trees use water stored in deep soil layers during wet years in the subsequent dry years (e.g., 2006 andRaz-Yaseef et al, 2012;Barbeta et al, 2015). Thus, the transfer of surplus rainwater from previous years should also be taken into consideration when adjusting the model with available water through the f WA and f WD , which are currently calculated only with the seasonal rainfall.…”
Section: Annual-basis Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…After the period of high water availability, the soil began to dry, and both the temperature and air vapor pressure deficit increased, creating conditions that are adverse to gas exchange (D' Ambrosio et al 2006, Mahouachi 2009). Soil water can be retained longer in forests than in agroforests, due to the higher density of plants, lower surface runoff and reduced water loss by evaporation, since less solar radiation can reach the ground (Eastham et al 1988, McDonald et al 2002, Silva et al 2011, Raz-Yaseef et al 2012. It is therefore possible that in SF the higher density of trees and reduced transpiration rates during the dry season were the main responsible factors for the greater soil water content in this system 50 days after the final rainfall, compared to AGP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensified storms have been shown to increase soil water holding by deeper infiltration. This soil water is less susceptible to evaporation, thus the increased storm intensity may increase the water availability for shrub/tree dominated microsites (Raz-Yaseef et al, 2012), but this depends on soil texture and rainfall intensity and needs further investigation for other areas.…”
Section: The Effects At Plot Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, ET has two distinct components (E and T ), which are controlled by different mechanisms. Partitioning ET is important not only for better understanding the water budget but also in predicting the biogeochemical fluxes driven by hydrological variations (e.g., Wang et al, 2010b;Raz-Yaseef et al, 2012). To efficiently use the limited water resources in drylands, we need to maximize the productive water loss (T ) and minimize the unproductive water loss (E) .…”
Section: Evapotranspiration Partitionmentioning
confidence: 99%