2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic social behavior algorithm for real-parameter optimization problems and optimization of hyper beamforming of linear antenna arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where � ⃗ a linearly decreases from 2 to 0, ⃗ r 1 and ⃗ r 2 are random vector generated within 0 and 1. Detailed mathematical illustration of the concept of prey encircling can be found in the work of Mirjalili et al [41] and Prajindra et al [59].…”
Section: Grey Wolf Optimisation (Gwo) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where � ⃗ a linearly decreases from 2 to 0, ⃗ r 1 and ⃗ r 2 are random vector generated within 0 and 1. Detailed mathematical illustration of the concept of prey encircling can be found in the work of Mirjalili et al [41] and Prajindra et al [59].…”
Section: Grey Wolf Optimisation (Gwo) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considering the theory of No Free Lunch [58] which implies that no single optimiser can boast of being superior to the others for all optimisation tasks, and as such meta-heuristics are task-specific, inspires the selection of GWO as the choice for training the MLP classifier in this study. GWO is a recently proposed Swarmbased algorithm which emulates the social leadership hierarchy and unique hunting mechanism of Grey Wolfs [59]. When compared to other metaheuristics, the unique search mechanism of the GWO significantly enhances the algorithm's ability to optimally achieve a balance between the exploration and exploitation search phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the topological complexity, conventional enhancement methods involving equivalent network models or experience-driven parametric studies can only yield sub-optimal designs, and are generally unsuitable for handling multiple design goals, conditions on electrical performance figures, and multiple parameters. Instead, rigorous numerical optimization is recommended 24 , 25 . Probably the most serious bottleneck thereof constitutes the inflated computational cost that is problematic even for local parameter adjustment (e.g., gradient-based 26 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%