2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-015-9736-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic response of a flexible rectangular underground structure in sand: centrifuge modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the constraints of surrounding rocks or soil, underground structures are well known to suffer less damage induced by earthquakes than surface structures; thus, underground structures are generally believed to be strongly resistant to earthquakes unless they are crossed by active faults [1,2]. However, many instances of noticeable seismic damage of underground structures were reported during several strong earthquake events, including the Kobe earthquake in Japan [3,4], the Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey [5,6], the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan [7,8], and the Wenchuan earthquake in China [9][10][11]. ese earthquake disasters provide sufficient evidences to demonstrate that the stability of underground structures located in seismically active areas is still an important and emergent issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the constraints of surrounding rocks or soil, underground structures are well known to suffer less damage induced by earthquakes than surface structures; thus, underground structures are generally believed to be strongly resistant to earthquakes unless they are crossed by active faults [1,2]. However, many instances of noticeable seismic damage of underground structures were reported during several strong earthquake events, including the Kobe earthquake in Japan [3,4], the Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey [5,6], the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan [7,8], and the Wenchuan earthquake in China [9][10][11]. ese earthquake disasters provide sufficient evidences to demonstrate that the stability of underground structures located in seismically active areas is still an important and emergent issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many scholars have used numerical simulation methods to investigate the seismic behavior of soil-structure interactions (e.g., soil-tunnel interactions), an appropriate and more advanced constructive model would better predict the actual behavior of soil under earthquake forces. The use of some constitutive models such as Prevost's multi-yield model and the intergranular strain anisotropy model (ISA) requires complex calibration to determine their various parameters, which decreases their utility in research [23]. However, isotropic/kinematic plastic hardening models, comprising isotropic and kinematic hardening components, accurately predict soil behavior under dynamic loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SAJB has relatively poor seismic performance compared with IAJB [6,7]. Meanwhile, the longitudinal structures of bridge and the constraint structures of transverse anti-falling beams in SAJB are easier to damage under seismic load [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Therefore, Zhuang [14] and Chen [15] proposed a new type of micro piles made by concrete to improve the seismic behavior of SAJB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%