52nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2002. (Cat. No.02CH37345)
DOI: 10.1109/ectc.2002.1008156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling and measurement of personal computer motherboards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method does not directly give the local PCB response, and is only compatible with the deflection based failure criteria provided by Steinberg. The validity of the transmissibility assumption is questionable, as Pitarresi et al [53] measured critical damping of 2% for a computer motherboard, whilst using the given assumption would have given 3.5% (based on a natural frequency of 54 Hz), which would have lead to a large underestimate of the response.…”
Section: Analytical Response Predictionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This method does not directly give the local PCB response, and is only compatible with the deflection based failure criteria provided by Steinberg. The validity of the transmissibility assumption is questionable, as Pitarresi et al [53] measured critical damping of 2% for a computer motherboard, whilst using the given assumption would have given 3.5% (based on a natural frequency of 54 Hz), which would have lead to a large underestimate of the response.…”
Section: Analytical Response Predictionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several authors demonstrate the use of detailed FE models to calculate the PCB vibration response [30,37,53,57,58] (Figs 1 to 3 show examples at increasing level of detail); however the use of these techniques would not be recommended for a commercial case (unless a precise prediction of the local response was absolutely vital), as the time required to build and solve such a model is excessive when simplified models produce data of appropriate accuracy much more quickly and with less effort. The time required to build and solve a detailed FE model can be reduced by using the JEDEC 4 lead spring constants published by [33][34][35], these spring constants can be used in place of a detailed FE model of each lead 5 .…”
Section: Detailed Fe Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mechanical shock and random vibration response of personal computer motherboards were measured and modeled by Pitarresi et al[116]. The effect of strain rate on solder joint failure under mechanical loading was reported by 2.9.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%