2020
DOI: 10.1364/optica.405187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic distortion in resonant galvanometric optical scanners

Abstract: High-speed optical systems are revolutionizing biomedical imaging in microscopy, DNA sequencing, and flow cytometry, as well as numerous other applications, including data storage, display technologies, printing, and autonomous vehicles. These systems often achieve the necessary imaging or sensing speed through the use of resonant galvanometric optical scanners. Here, we show that the optical performance of these devices suffers due to the dynamic mirror distortion that arises from the variation in torque with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple sources of jitter are known to affect resonant scanning imaging which we group into three main categories: 1) mirror jitter, 2) feedback jitter, and 3) synchronization jitter. Mirror jitter is attributed to the mechanical instability of the mirror due to physical factors such as inertial effects [ 30 ], [ 31 ], vibrations [ 31 ], or thermal drift [ 31 ]. Feedback jitter is due to the limitation on how accurately the scanner position can be tracked electronically and has traditionally been addressed by tracking the mirror position optically [ 23 ][ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple sources of jitter are known to affect resonant scanning imaging which we group into three main categories: 1) mirror jitter, 2) feedback jitter, and 3) synchronization jitter. Mirror jitter is attributed to the mechanical instability of the mirror due to physical factors such as inertial effects [ 30 ], [ 31 ], vibrations [ 31 ], or thermal drift [ 31 ]. Feedback jitter is due to the limitation on how accurately the scanner position can be tracked electronically and has traditionally been addressed by tracking the mirror position optically [ 23 ][ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, serial scanning MPL is unfortunately too slow to be a valuable solution for many practical applications. Although attempts at multi-foci parallelization increase the printing throughput of the scanning MPL, the printing speed is still limited by the inertia of the scanning mirrors [36][37][38][39], and it can only print periodic structures [28,[40][41][42][43][44], resulting in a loss of nanomanufacturing flexibility. Therefore, it remains a serious challenge to take advantage of both scanning and projection methods while avoiding their shortcomings to achieve arbitrary complex 3D structures with high throughput, high accuracy, and broad material applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major distortion also arises when imaging over an extended field, due to the typically flat shape of detectors compared with the highly curved retina. Static distortions can also occur for raster systems employing resonant scanners due to error in the desinusoiding process [ 20 ]; from systematic errors of the hardware [ 21 ]; or from eye movement patterns such as nystagmus which are large, repeatable and potentially have periodicity similar to the imaging frame rate such that pseudo-static distortion could result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%