2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2891452
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyadic Green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene

Abstract: An exact solution is obtained for the electromagnetic field due to an electric current in the presence of a surface conductivity model of graphene. The graphene is represented by an infinitesimallythin, local and isotropic two-sided conductivity surface. The field is obtained in terms of dyadic Green's functions represented as Sommerfeld integrals. The solution of plane-wave reflection and transmission is presented, and surface wave propagation along graphene is studied via the poles of the Sommerfeld integral… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
1,102
0
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,505 publications
(1,190 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
14
1,102
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1c plots the frequency-dependent real and imaginary parts of the extracted conductivity s S for several DC biasing voltages applied between the graphene layers. In the low THz band, the real component of the sample conductivity does not vary with frequency, whereas the magnitude of the imaginary part, which facilitates the propagation of surface plasmons in this frequency band 37 , increases with frequency following a standard Drude model. Figure 2 shows the measured reconfiguration capabilities of the fabricated graphene stack at f ¼ 1.5 THz in different scenarios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1c plots the frequency-dependent real and imaginary parts of the extracted conductivity s S for several DC biasing voltages applied between the graphene layers. In the low THz band, the real component of the sample conductivity does not vary with frequency, whereas the magnitude of the imaginary part, which facilitates the propagation of surface plasmons in this frequency band 37 , increases with frequency following a standard Drude model. Figure 2 shows the measured reconfiguration capabilities of the fabricated graphene stack at f ¼ 1.5 THz in different scenarios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the two-dimensional (2D) nature of this material, the surface plasmons it supports have very short wavelengths and exhibit extreme out-of-plane confinement to the sheet, as has already been demonstrated in a number of experiments. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Compared to the noble metals commonly employed for plasmonics, 12 graphene has a low carrier concentration, and, for this reason, plasmons in graphene are relatively long-lived and appear at lower frequencies. While the plasmonic response of metals is weak at the infrared or lower frequencies, graphene plasmons exist in the THz regime with relatively low losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorption of graphene is usually derived from its 2D complex optical conductivity # ( , , , ), calculated from the Kubo formula [23,24]. It includes interband and intraband absorption and depends on the light angular frequency ω, chemical potential µ c , charged particle scattering rate Γ, and temperature T. The complex permittivity can be calculated from the optical conductivity as # = .…”
Section: Design and Fabrication Of Graphene Modulatormentioning
confidence: 99%