31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-3135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-expander engine flowfield simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical vertical velocity component at this altitude of existing launchers is approx. v(h) = 300 m/s [5]. The comparison of the Schmucker-criterion with available experimental data results in a deviation of experimental and theoretical data of S re i tU = <5 re /,/ « 8% , which finally results in a duration of the transitional phase, according to Eq.…”
Section: Nozzle Extension With Positive Wall Pressure Gradient ("Overmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A typical vertical velocity component at this altitude of existing launchers is approx. v(h) = 300 m/s [5]. The comparison of the Schmucker-criterion with available experimental data results in a deviation of experimental and theoretical data of S re i tU = <5 re /,/ « 8% , which finally results in a duration of the transitional phase, according to Eq.…”
Section: Nozzle Extension With Positive Wall Pressure Gradient ("Overmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, the flow separates on one side of the nozzle at the lower separation wall pressure p w (l -8 Te i,i), and on the opposite nozzle wall at the upper separation wall pressure p w (l + 6 re i, u )-The projection of the tilted separation line on a plane normal to the side load direction is assumed to have an elliptic form. Further details can be found in [5]. The interpretation of Eq.…”
Section: Nozzle Extension With Positive Wall Pressure Gradient ("Overmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations