The extent of the binocular cortical field in albino mice, as revealed by recording from single cells, was almost normal; although the input from the ipsilateral eye was weaker than normal, most cells were driven from both eyes. By backfilling retinal ganglion cells from one optic tract with horseradish peroxidase we examined the origins of the retinofugal projections. Filled cells ipsilateral to the injected tract were concentrated in a crescent-shaped area bordering the inferior temperal retina. In black mice this area constituted 20% of the total retinal area, in albinos 17%. In black mice we counted nearly 1,000 labeled cells in the ipsilateral retina, or 2.6% of all cells filled in both eyes. Albinos had about one-third fewer filled cells ipsilaterally than black mice. Four percent of all ipsilaterally filled cells in black mice and 8% in albinos were scattered outside of the crescent region. The density of ipsilaterally projecting cells was uniform throughout the crescent region in black mice, but decreased toward the central retina in albinos. In retinas contralateral to the injection up to 39,000 cells were filled-about two-thirds of the cells in the ganglion-cell layer whose cytoplasm contained conspicuous Nissl substance. Depending on classification of unfilled cells as ganglion cells or interneurons, we estimated a total of 48,000 to 65,000 ganglion cells to exist in the retina. The size distribution of ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells was similar in albinos and normals. Ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells were on average 1.8-3 times larger in volume than contralaterally projecting ones in both types of mice. Displaced ganglion cells were relatively more common in ipsilateral retinofugal projections: 21% of all ipsilateral ganglion cells were displaced versus less than 1% of all the contralateral ganglion cells in black mice. In albinos only 13% of the ganglion cells in the ipsilateral retina were displaced. The overall reduction in ipsilaterally projecting cells in albinos was reflected twice as much in displaced ganglion cells as in normally placed ones.

Peripheral auditory neurons are tuned to single frequencies of sound. In the central auditory system, excitatory (or facilitatory) and inhibitory neural interactions take place at multiple levels and produce neurons with sharp level-tolerant frequency-tuning curves, neurons tuned to parameters other than frequency, cochleotopic (frequency) maps, which are different from the peripheral cochleotopic map, and computational maps. The mechanisms to create the response properties of these neurons have been considered to be solely caused by divergent and convergent projections of neurons in the ascending auditory system. The recent research on the corticofugal (descending) auditory system, however, indicates that the corticofugal system adjusts and improves auditory signal processing by modulating neural responses and maps. The corticofugal function consists of at least the following subfunctions. auditory system ͉ descending system ͉ learning and memory ͉ plasticity ͉ tonotopic map T he central auditory system creates many physiologically distinct types of neurons for auditory signal processing. Their response properties have been interpreted to be produced by divergent and convergent interactions between neurons in the ascending auditory system. Until recently, the contribution of the descending (corticofugal) system to the shaping (or even creation) of their response properties has hardly been considered. Recent findings indicate that the corticofugal system plays important roles in shaping or even creating the response properties of central auditory neurons and in reorganizing cochleotopic (frequency) and computational (e.g., echo-delay) maps. Therefore, the understanding of the neural mechanisms for auditory signal processing is incomplete without the exploration of the functional roles of the corticofugal system. In this article, we first enumerate several types of neurons and computational maps created in the bat's central auditory system and then describe the anatomy and physiology of the corticofugal system. Neurons Tuned to Acoustic Parameters Characterizing Biosonar Signals and Cochleotopic and Computational MapsAll peripheral neurons are tuned to single frequencies (best frequencies, BFs). In the central auditory system, excitatory, inhibitory, and facilitatory neural interactions take place at multiple levels and produce neurons with sharp level-tolerant (the width of a frequency tuning curve is narrow regardless of sound levels) frequency tuning curves (1) and also neurons tuned to specific values of parameters other than frequency. Some of these neurons apparently are related to the processing of biosonar signals. They are latency-constant, phasic on-responding neurons (2, 3); paradoxical latency-shift neurons (4); durationtuned neurons (5) amplitude coordinates for the fine spatio-temporal representation of periodic frequency and amplitude modulations of echoes from flying insects (9). In the superior colliculus of the big brown bat, there is a space map, and some neurons are tuned to a sound source at ...

1. Delay-tuned combination-sensitive neurons (FM-FM neurons) have been discovered in the dorsal and medial divisions of the medial geniculate body (MGB) of the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii). In this paper we present evidence for a thalamic origin for FM-FM neurons. Our examination of the response properties of FM-FM neurons indicates that the neural mechanism of delay-tuning depends on coincidence detection and involves an interaction between neural inhibition and excitation. 2. The biosonar pulse (P) and its echo (E) produced and heard by the mustached bat consist of four harmonics; each harmonic contains a constant frequency (CF) component and a frequency modulated (FM) component. Thus the pulse-echo pair contains eight CF components (PCF1-4, ECF1-4) and eight FM components (PFM1-4, EFM1-4). The stimuli used in this study consisted of CF, FM, and CF-FM sounds: paired CF-FM sounds were used to simulate any two harmonics of pulse-echo pairs. The responses of FM-FM neurons in the MGB were recorded extracellularly. We found that FM-FM neurons respond poorly or not at all to single sounds, respond strongly to paired sounds, and are tuned to the frequency and amplitude of each sound of the pair and to the time interval separating them (simulated echo delay). 3. All FM-FM neurons are facilitated by paired FM sounds and most are facilitated by paired CF sounds. Best facilitative frequencies measured with paired CF sounds fall outside the frequency ranges of the CF components of biosonar signals, whereas best facilitative frequencies measured with paired FM sounds fall within the frequency ranges of the FM components of biosonar signals. Thus FM-FM neurons are expected to respond selectively to combinations of FM components in biosonar signals. The FM components of pulse-echo pairs essential to facilitate FM-FM neurons are the FM component of the fundamental of the pulse (PFM1) in combination with the FM component of the second, third, or fourth harmonic of an echo (EFM2, EFM3, EFM4; collectively, EFMn). 4. The frequency combinations to which FM-FM neurons are tuned reflect small deviations from the harmonic relationship such as occurs in combinations of FM components from pulses and Doppler-shifted echoes. Compared with CF/CF neurons, however, FM-FM neurons are broadly tuned to stimulus frequency. Thus FM-FM neurons are Doppler-shift tolerant and relatively unspecialized for processing velocity information in the frequency domain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. Orientation sounds (pulses) emitted by the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii) consist of up to four harmonics (H1-4); each harmonic contains a constant frequency (CF) component and a terminal frequency modulated (FM) component, so that there are eight components in total (CF1-4 and FM1-4). By referring the echo from a target to the emitted pulse, the mustached bat derives velocity information from Doppler shift and distance information from echo delay. In this study, the responses of single neurons in the medial geniculate body (MGB) to synthetic biosonar signals were investigated. Stimuli consisted of CF, FM, and CF-FM sounds. Paired CF-FM sounds were used to mimic any two harmonics of pulse-echo pairs. The dorsal and medial divisions of the MGB were found to contain combination-sensitive neurons. These neurons responded poorly to individual sounds regardless of frequency and amplitude and were facilitated by paired sounds presented at particular frequencies, amplitudes and inter-component intervals (simulated echo delay). Combination-sensitive neurons were tuned to the frequencies that characterize particular components of natural biosonar signals and were classified according to the components of pulse-echo pairs that best matched the spectral selectivity of the neuron. Two classes of combination-sensitive neurons were found, CF/CF and FM-FM. This paper focuses on CF/CF combination-sensitive neurons, which extract velocity information from paired CF components, and on CF2 and CF3 neurons, which, although not combination-sensitive, are tuned to the frequencies of the CF2 and CF3 components of biosonar signals. 2. CF2 and CF3 neurons were sharply tuned in frequency. The best frequencies of the most sharply tuned CF2 neurons were all approximately equal to 61.17 kHz (SD = 370 Hz), which closely matches the frequency at which P. parnellii stabilizes the CF2 component of an echo when compensating for Doppler shift. Thus CF2 neurons are specialized for a fine analysis of Doppler-compensated echoes. 3. Tuning curves of CF2 and CF3 neurons remained narrow regardless of stimulus level. When compared at high stimulus levels (30 and 50 dB above minimum threshold), bandwidths of tuning curves of CF2 and CF3 neurons were much smaller than those of peripheral auditory neurons turned to CF2 or CF3 frequencies but were about the same as those of cortical neurons tuned to CF2 or CF3 frequencies. Thus the sharpening of neural tuning curves by the bat's central auditory system occurs within or before the MGB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

No abstract