The corticofugal system for hearing: Recent progress

Abstract

Peripheral auditory neurons are tuned to single frequencies of sound. In the central auditory system, excitatory (or facilitatory) and inhibitory neural interactions take place at multiple levels and produce neurons with sharp level-tolerant frequency-tuning curves, neurons tuned to parameters other than frequency, cochleotopic (frequency) maps, which are different from the peripheral cochleotopic map, and computational maps. The mechanisms to create the response properties of these neurons have been considered to be solely caused by divergent and convergent projections of neurons in the ascending auditory system. The recent research on the corticofugal (descending) auditory system, however, indicates that the corticofugal system adjusts and improves auditory signal processing by modulating neural responses and maps. The corticofugal function consists of at least the following subfunctions. auditory system ͉ descending system ͉ learning and memory ͉ plasticity ͉ tonotopic map T he central auditory system creates many physiologically distinct types of neurons for auditory signal processing. Their response properties have been interpreted to be produced by divergent and convergent interactions between neurons in the ascending auditory system. Until recently, the contribution of the descending (corticofugal) system to the shaping (or even creation) of their response properties has hardly been considered. Recent findings indicate that the corticofugal system plays important roles in shaping or even creating the response properties of central auditory neurons and in reorganizing cochleotopic (frequency) and computational (e.g., echo-delay) maps. Therefore, the understanding of the neural mechanisms for auditory signal processing is incomplete without the exploration of the functional roles of the corticofugal system. In this article, we first enumerate several types of neurons and computational maps created in the bat's central auditory system and then describe the anatomy and physiology of the corticofugal system. Neurons Tuned to Acoustic Parameters Characterizing Biosonar Signals and Cochleotopic and Computational MapsAll peripheral neurons are tuned to single frequencies (best frequencies, BFs). In the central auditory system, excitatory, inhibitory, and facilitatory neural interactions take place at multiple levels and produce neurons with sharp level-tolerant (the width of a frequency tuning curve is narrow regardless of sound levels) frequency tuning curves (1) and also neurons tuned to specific values of parameters other than frequency. Some of these neurons apparently are related to the processing of biosonar signals. They are latency-constant, phasic on-responding neurons (2, 3); paradoxical latency-shift neurons (4); durationtuned neurons (5) amplitude coordinates for the fine spatio-temporal representation of periodic frequency and amplitude modulations of echoes from flying insects (9). In the superior colliculus of the big brown bat, there is a space map, and some neurons are tuned to a sound source at ...

Differential Ear Effects of Profound Unilateral Deafness on the Adult Human Central Auditory System

“…This would require a profound difference in effect regarding the side of hearing loss in the initiation of these changes. This asymmetry could be in the afferent pathway leading to the midbrain but could potentially also result from an asymmetric gain control mediated by the corticofugal pathways at the midbrain level (Suga et al 2000). Stimulating with pulsed tones presented at 6/s (Scheffler et al 1998) also resulted in increased symmetry in the unilaterally deaf as measured using fMRI.…”

Selective neurophysiologic responses to music in instrumentalists with different listening biographies

“…One mechanism involves specialized neurons that are tuned to relevant aspects of sensory input, or attenuate irrelevant aspects [e.g., Gordon and O'Neil, 2000;Rauschecker et al, 1995;Wong et al, 2007b]. In the auditory system, which subserves both speech and music processing, evidence suggests that low-level neurons are tuned to basic acoustic properties such as center frequency (CF) and frequency modulation (FM) (''information-bearing elements'' or IBEs), while high-level neurons are sensitive to relevant parts and combinations of IBEs, which carry species-specific communicative functions [Suga, 1995;Suga et al, 2000]. For example, in speech, combinations of formants (CF) and formant transitions (FM) form certain consonant-vowel sequences, which are arguably represented in the middle and anterior portion of the superior temporal region [Binder et al, 2000;Liebenthal et al, 2005;Scott et al, 2000].…”

Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns

“…Musicians have extensive experience using pitch information in the context of music, which requires both high cognitive demands and auditory acuity. This functional interplay is possibly mediated via feedback from the higher-level cortex to the inferior colliculus (made possible anatomically by the corticofugal pathway 10 ), such that accurate pitch information is relayed from subcortical structures to the neocortex to facilitate successful performance of cognitively demanding tasks. Cortical electrophysiology shows musical training to facilitate language processing in adults 11 , and we are the first to show this effect in brainstem responses.…”