2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dry Surface Treatments of Silk Biomaterials and Their Utility in Biomedical Applications

Abstract: Silk-based materials are widely used in biomaterial and tissue engineering applications due to their cytocompatibility and tunable mechanical and biodegradation properties. Aqueous-based processing techniques have enabled the fabrication of silk into a broad range of material formats, making it a highly versatile material platform across multiple industries. Utilizing the full potential of silk in biomedical applications frequently requires modification of silk's surface properties. Dry surface modification te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical modifications of SF scaffolds include ultraviolet (UV) treatment, gas treatment and plasma treatment (Lau et al, 2020). UV irradiation of SF scaffolds can increase wettability and improve cell adhesion without obvious weight loss, crystallinity change and strength decrease (Li et al, 2012;Khosravi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Surface Modification Of Sf Hybrid Scaffolds 431 Physical Mod...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical modifications of SF scaffolds include ultraviolet (UV) treatment, gas treatment and plasma treatment (Lau et al, 2020). UV irradiation of SF scaffolds can increase wettability and improve cell adhesion without obvious weight loss, crystallinity change and strength decrease (Li et al, 2012;Khosravi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Surface Modification Of Sf Hybrid Scaffolds 431 Physical Mod...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both strategies, the spectra showed distinct signals of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen with almost the same atomic concentrations of around 65, 30, and 5%, respectively (Figure b). No silicon signal was detected, indicating that the silicon wafer underneath the layer of nanoparticles was covered with layers of particles greater than the sensitivity depth of XPS, which is around 10 nm. The origin of the oxygen content on the surface of the nanoparticles is suggested to be either from residual oxygen in the plasma chamber or from the exposure to atmosphere post plasma polymerization. Due to the relatively low base pressure (below 5 × 10 –5 Torr), oxidation reactions that take place postproduction are the more likely contributors to the presence of oxygen on the PPNs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XPS survey spectra presented in Figure 1c show the presence of carbon and oxygen elements in the shellac coatings. XPS has a sampling depth of around 10 nm, [30][31][32][33] and thus no signals from the substrate were detected. The C, O, and Si atomic concentrations for the SH10 sample are 78.46%, 19.56%, and 1.98%, while those measured for the SH50 sample are 80.97%, 17.03% and 2.00%, respectively.…”
Section: Fabrication and Characterization Of Shellac Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%