2017
DOI: 10.1109/mias.2016.2600739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving Toward Accessibility: A Review of Technological Improvements for Electric Machines, Power Electronics, and Batteries for Electric and Hybrid Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…FBG reflected wavelength changes were monitored at 3 different speeds for both positions: 50 rpm, 500 rpm and 1800 rpm. These were chosen to ascertain the sensing performance potential of interest for low speed applications such as wind turbine generators, or in variable speed applications such as electric vehicle propulsion motors [20], [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FBG reflected wavelength changes were monitored at 3 different speeds for both positions: 50 rpm, 500 rpm and 1800 rpm. These were chosen to ascertain the sensing performance potential of interest for low speed applications such as wind turbine generators, or in variable speed applications such as electric vehicle propulsion motors [20], [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 20 years, IMs have been the most popular EM type for EVs, because of their low cost, high reliability, and mature manufacturing and control techniques [14], [15]. However, PM synchronous machines tend to have higher torque density and efficiency than IMs, and thus are becoming increasingly attractive for EVs [14], [16]. In particular, interior PM (IPM) motors for passenger car applications have higher overload capability and efficiency than IMs and surfacemounted PM (SPM) machines [15], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, The introduction of novel converter topologies is a common approach in non-isolated photovoltaic systems, and a number of single-phase (Table 1) and three-phase topologies have been proposed for CMV reduction in such applications [32][33][34][35][36][37]. As two-level three-phase technologies are dominant in EV propulsion systems [38], single-phase photovoltaic topologies cannot be directly used for vehicle propulsion systems. However, their underlying concepts can be used to propose equivalent two-level three-phase alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%