2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of collaboration to mitigate climate change: An illustration of Swiss climate policy over 15 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
124
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
124
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result confirms that ideologies seem to matter more than power in conflictive policy subsystems (Ingold and Fischer 2014). It is further in line with former empirical analyses of the devil shift phenomenon, where expectations with respect to the power dimension could not be confirmed as clearly as those with respect to the "evilness" dimension (Sabatier et al 1987, 470).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This result confirms that ideologies seem to matter more than power in conflictive policy subsystems (Ingold and Fischer 2014). It is further in line with former empirical analyses of the devil shift phenomenon, where expectations with respect to the power dimension could not be confirmed as clearly as those with respect to the "evilness" dimension (Sabatier et al 1987, 470).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We follow Ingold and Fischer (2014) with respect to model specification. See the supporting information for a detailed theoretical discussion.…”
Section: Exogenous Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The directed outcome network reflects collaboration among four government agencies, five political parties, six scientific/research organizations, 11 organized interest groups (private-sector and business associations), and seven environmental nongovernmental organizations (NGOs ;Ingold 2008;Ingold and Fischer 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a setting, scientists are expected to sit at the coalition's periphery (Ingold and Fischer, 2014). Cues for Type 2 reasoning need to come from the exogenous network environment, which will be introduced in the next section.…”
Section: How We Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%