2014
DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2014.929013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of cattle commercialization in rural South Africa: A combined test of transaction cost and store-of-wealth hypotheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research shows that the limited success of rural development policies is owed to supply-side challenges such as high transaction costs, high risk associated with new products, poor infrastructure, high price variability and weak bargaining power of small-scale producers (Delgado 1999;Ortmann and King 2010;Obi et al 2012). Empirical research in the livestock subsector contends that transaction costs cause smallholder farmers to self-select out of livestock markets, and this challenge is compounded by the incidence of non-commercial motives among ranchers (Groenewald and Jooste 2012;Ndoro and Hitayezu 2014;Ndoro et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research shows that the limited success of rural development policies is owed to supply-side challenges such as high transaction costs, high risk associated with new products, poor infrastructure, high price variability and weak bargaining power of small-scale producers (Delgado 1999;Ortmann and King 2010;Obi et al 2012). Empirical research in the livestock subsector contends that transaction costs cause smallholder farmers to self-select out of livestock markets, and this challenge is compounded by the incidence of non-commercial motives among ranchers (Groenewald and Jooste 2012;Ndoro and Hitayezu 2014;Ndoro et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Beef cattle and dairy production are important to their livelihoods, whereas meat production from monogastric animals is less favored in the region (Elleboudt 2012). In southern Africa, communal livestock serve various purposes other than food; for example, draft power for plows and wagons, cultural value (such as marriage payments and in rituals), and a more stable investment than volatile national currencies (Ndoro and Hitayezu 2014).…”
Section: Current Land Use In the Maloti-drakensbergmentioning
confidence: 99%