2015
DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2014.959056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmers’ choice of cattle marketing channels under transaction cost in rural South Africa: a multinomial logit model

Abstract: This study applied a transaction cost approach to the analysis of cattle marketing behaviour among smallholder farmers in communal land areas of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The objective was to test the effects of information, negotiation, and monitoring costs on the decision to sell to private buyers, speculators or at auction. The theoretical predictions of transaction cost economics were tested based on primary data collected from 230 cattle farm households in 13 communities of the Okhahlamba Local Municip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate change especially drought and increasing production cost has slowed down sheep production in South Africa (Molotsi et al 2017). This gap between demand for and supply of sheep and sheep products has provided a great opportunity for integrating smallholder sheep farmers into the value chain (Ndoro et al 2015). However, the inability of smallholder sheep farmers to exploit the full potential is due to inadequate infrastructure, lack of management skills, inadequate feed resources, as well as inadequate techniques for genetic improvement of their livestock (Rege et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Climate change especially drought and increasing production cost has slowed down sheep production in South Africa (Molotsi et al 2017). This gap between demand for and supply of sheep and sheep products has provided a great opportunity for integrating smallholder sheep farmers into the value chain (Ndoro et al 2015). However, the inability of smallholder sheep farmers to exploit the full potential is due to inadequate infrastructure, lack of management skills, inadequate feed resources, as well as inadequate techniques for genetic improvement of their livestock (Rege et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have examined livestock production and market participation of smallholder livestock farmers in South Africa (Rios et al 2009;Mafukata 2015;Ndoro et al 2014;Ndoro et al 2015;Ngarava et al 2019;Molotsi et al 2017;Bahta and Bauer 2012), market factors inhibiting the competitiveness or profitability of smallholder farmers (Mpandeli and Maponya, 2014;Dlamini, 2014), technical efficiency and technological gap in sheep production (Nyam et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 13%, 11% and 6% of the respondents were aware of abattoirs, traders and wet markets, respectively. The higher recognition of farm gate marketing channel is due to its popularity to smallholder farmers because these take place among neighbours and between neighbouring communities, mainly in the form of barter or cash sales (5). The KyD scheme also plays a prominent role in encouraging livestock marketing [27], informing the participants into formal market channels is fundamental hence 35% of these farmers are knowledgeable of auction markets.…”
Section: Descriptive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2]. Approximately 3 million subsistence as well as 240,000 small-scale farmers own 5.6 million cattle relative to 50,000 commercial farmers who own 8.2 million cattle [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation