2011
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2010.2092770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver Inattention Monitoring System for Intelligent Vehicles: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
141
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, different physiological signals have been used to monitor alertness, such as spectral analysis of HRV (90% accuracy) [85] and EEG (0.913 ± 0.027 correlation between actual and estimated alertness levels) [86], wavelet coefficients of EEG combined with features from EOG and EMG (97-98% 3-class overall accuracy) [87], and time, spectral, and wavelet features from single-lead EEG [88]. Neuromuscular (EEG, EOG, EMG) and cardiac (ECG) signals have been analyzed predominantly in order to detect drowsiness, though additional physiological recordings (oximetry, skin conductance), physical measures (eye movement/blinks, face and mouth images), and driver's performance measures (steering wheel movements) have been also proposed as inputs to different pattern recognition methods, specially Bayesian networks, SVMs, and ensembles of linear classifiers [89][90][91]. The main limitation of these automated algorithms is that a great amount of data is needed to perform an accurate training of the pattern recognition method.…”
Section: Driver's Drowsiness Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, different physiological signals have been used to monitor alertness, such as spectral analysis of HRV (90% accuracy) [85] and EEG (0.913 ± 0.027 correlation between actual and estimated alertness levels) [86], wavelet coefficients of EEG combined with features from EOG and EMG (97-98% 3-class overall accuracy) [87], and time, spectral, and wavelet features from single-lead EEG [88]. Neuromuscular (EEG, EOG, EMG) and cardiac (ECG) signals have been analyzed predominantly in order to detect drowsiness, though additional physiological recordings (oximetry, skin conductance), physical measures (eye movement/blinks, face and mouth images), and driver's performance measures (steering wheel movements) have been also proposed as inputs to different pattern recognition methods, specially Bayesian networks, SVMs, and ensembles of linear classifiers [89][90][91]. The main limitation of these automated algorithms is that a great amount of data is needed to perform an accurate training of the pattern recognition method.…”
Section: Driver's Drowsiness Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method has low accuracy and very susceptible to environmental noise. A facial expression such as eye closure and yawning mouth, as well as a head movement, are variables commonly analyzed in video-based data [17]. As drowsiness is also accompanied by distinctive body movements, force plate data that measure body sway may be very helpful to improve the accuracy of video-based data.…”
Section: Motion Analysis In the Driving Behavior Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure sensor and EMG is very common used to measure task performance, therefore, they should be more useful to detect task-related fatigue. Furthermore, as each measurement has its own deficiencies apart from their advantages, the combination of various measurement methods has been suggested to be used to improve the accuracy of detection [17].…”
Section: Motion Analysis In the Driving Behavior Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main methods of fatigue driving detection can be divided into subjective detection methods and objective detection methods [7][8]. The subjective detection methods require the driver to determine their degree of fatigue by checking the driving record sheet and their own physiological response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%