2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric Predictors of Laryngeal Edema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laryngeal edema was a common late toxicity exclusively for ccb patients and was more common in hypopharyngeal (26%) than in oropharyngeal carcinomas (14%). According to Sanguinetti et al [19], the mean laryngeal dose should be kept below 43.5 Gy to minimize ≥ grade 2 laryngeal edema. Although dosimetric data were not available for all patients, the radiotherapy technique used in this study did not allow this dose constraint to be maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laryngeal edema was a common late toxicity exclusively for ccb patients and was more common in hypopharyngeal (26%) than in oropharyngeal carcinomas (14%). According to Sanguinetti et al [19], the mean laryngeal dose should be kept below 43.5 Gy to minimize ≥ grade 2 laryngeal edema. Although dosimetric data were not available for all patients, the radiotherapy technique used in this study did not allow this dose constraint to be maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early data from a study by Feng et al (11) appear to reinforce this by suggesting that a mean dose threshold of 50 Gy to the larynx correlates with dysphagia, although they found no evidence of a similar effect at a dose <40 Gy. Sanguineti et al (12) recommended a mean laryngeal dose threshold of 43.5 Gy and a volume receiving 50% of prescribed dose of <27% to minimize laryngeal edema. All these constraints were comfortably achieved in this study for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present cohort, due to positive lymph nodes, the vast majority of patients (20/22) received a radiation dose of 43.5 Gy and higher to the larynx, which has been described in the literature as cutoff value for developing voice problems or chronic edema [4,5]. Voice problems can also occur due to changes in saliva production and lubrication, mainly as a result of radiation dose to the parotid gland and the laryngeal mucosa, which can lead to insufficient lubrication/dryness of the vocal folds [37,55].…”
Section: Voice Qualitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, dysphagia can adversely affect compliance to treatment and post-treatment recovery (e.g., because of aspiration problems), and can deteriorate patient's social contacts and quality of life (QoL) [3]. Since radiation fields frequently encompass the larynx, also substantial effects on voice quality have been noted, which are correlated to the RT dose to the larynx [4][5][6]. Combination with chemotherapy aggravates these negative effects on patients' speech, daily life activities, and again QoL [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%