This method provides an effective quality control mechanism for evaluating the DVHs of the OARs. Adoption of such a method will advance the quality of current IMRT planning, providing better treatment plan consistency.
Purpose
To assess results of a multi-institutional study of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for early oropharyngeal cancer.
Patients and Methods
Patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma stage T1-2, N0-1, M0 requiring treatment of the bilateral neck were eligible. Chemotherapy was not permitted. Prescribed planning target volumes (PTVs) doses to primary tumor and involved nodes was 66 Gy at 2.2 Gy/fraction over 6 weeks. Sub-clinical PTVs received simultaneously 54-60 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction. Participating institutions were pre-approved for IMRT, and quality assurance review performed by the Image–Guided Therapy Center.
Results
69 patients accrued from 14 institutions. At median follow-up for surviving patients 2.8 years, 2-year estimated local-regional failure (LRF) rate was 9%. 2/4 patients (50%) with major under-dose deviations had LRF, compared with 3/49 (6%) without such deviations (p=0.04). All cases of LRF, metastasis, or second primary cancer, occurred among patients who were current/former smokers, and none among patients who never smoked. Maximal late toxicities grade ≥ 2 were skin 12%, mucosa 24%, salivary 67%, esophagus 19%, osteoradionecrosis 6%. Longer follow-up revealed reduced late toxicity in all categories. Xerostomia grade ≥ 2 was observed in 55% of patients at 6 months but reduced to 25% and 16% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In contrast, salivary output did not recover over time.
Conclusions
Moderately accelerated hypofractionatd IMRT without chemotherapy for early oropharyngeal cancer is feasible, achieving high tumor control rates and reduced salivary toxicity compared with similar patients in previous RTOG studies. Major target under-dose deviations were associated with higher LRF rate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.