2018
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2018.2789901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doping Dependent Assessment of Accumulation Mode and Junctionless FET for 1T DRAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional one-transistor one-capacitor dynamic random-access memory (1T-1C DRAM) has reached its scaling limit due to the difficulty of miniaturizing capacitors. Therefore, capacitor-less one-transistor dynamic random-access memory (1T-DRAM), which does not need complicated capacitor fabrication, has been studied as a possible replacement for 1T-1C DRAM [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. 1T-DRAM can be densely integrated because it has a small 4F 2 cell size with a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) transistor as its basic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional one-transistor one-capacitor dynamic random-access memory (1T-1C DRAM) has reached its scaling limit due to the difficulty of miniaturizing capacitors. Therefore, capacitor-less one-transistor dynamic random-access memory (1T-DRAM), which does not need complicated capacitor fabrication, has been studied as a possible replacement for 1T-1C DRAM [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. 1T-DRAM can be densely integrated because it has a small 4F 2 cell size with a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) transistor as its basic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 a shows the conduction band (CB) diagram at zero bias condition for different gate length (100 nm, 75 nm, and 50 nm). Reduction in gate length reduces the storage area for floating based memory, which reduces the retention time [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. The operation of this synaptic transistor is based on the floating body effect, and charge trapping/de-trapping from the nitride layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident from the table that due to core-shell dual gate nanowire transistor achieves better retention time. The speed of the memory is estimated through write time (WT) and it is defined as the requirement of maximum time to perform the operation while current ratio (CR) is estimated through (I1/I0) [23], [28]. Core-gate helps to achieve deeper potential well compared to conventional double gate transistor, which enhance the retention of state "1" and thus, retention time of the memory [24], [30].…”
Section: Input Information Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with Z 2 -FET [32], our results better retention time and comparable current ratio with shorter gate length. Junctionless device has shallower potential depth and lower Charge trap / de-trap carrier lifetime due to higher doping [28], [33], which are not able to achieve high retention time compared to CSDG device. In comparison with [22], [34], CSDG device achieves higher current ratio and longer retention time.…”
Section: Input Information Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%