2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the presence of mandibular third molars increase the risk of angle fracture and simultaneously decrease the risk of condylar fracture?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
49
3
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
11
49
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with other studies, our results confirmed an increased risk of angle fractures when M3s were present as well as a variable risk for angle fractures depending on M3 position [1,2,4,[8][9][10][11]. We found higher incidence of angle fracture in the age group B (19-39 years) which is similar to Halmos et al [12] study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with other studies, our results confirmed an increased risk of angle fractures when M3s were present as well as a variable risk for angle fractures depending on M3 position [1,2,4,[8][9][10][11]. We found higher incidence of angle fracture in the age group B (19-39 years) which is similar to Halmos et al [12] study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fractures of the mandibular angle represent the largest percentage of mandibular fractures in many studies [1,2]. Approximately 25-33 % of all mandibular fractures are angle fractures and several proposed reasons include the presence of third molars; a thinner cross-sectional area than the tooth-bearing region and also biomechanically the angle can be considered a ''lever'' area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in animals and humans have confirmed that the presence of third molars is associated with an increased risk of mandibular angle fractures. 1,4,10 Many authors have concluded that the severity of the force necessary to produce an angle fracture is substantially less when a third molar is present compared with when absent. 1 According to a theory, the third molars would weaken the angle by reducing the total available bone mass in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the precise reduction and fixation of mandibular fractures, difficulties are often encountered in repositioning the condylar fragments and performing accurate placement of the plates and screws (19), in addition there is the possibility of facial nerve injury (20,21), excellent reduction and stable fixation in angle fractures are easily performed because the access and visibility to the angle fractures for plating is much better. Thus it might not be appropriate to strengthen the mandibular angle region and to make the mandible more vulnerable to condylar fractures by removing the unerupted third molars because the treatment of condylar fractures is more challenging than that of angle (22,23).…”
Section: IVmentioning
confidence: 99%