2002
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6237.00079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Privatization Protect Natural Resources? Property Rights and Forests in Guatemala

Abstract: Objectives. Property rights are central to debates about natural resource policy. Governments traditionally have been seen as the appropriate custodians of natural resources for their citizens. More recently, many argue the privatization of property rights will ensure that users have incentives to manage their resources well. Common property, to the extent it is discussed at all, is seen as leading to the tragedy of the commons. We evaluate these claims by assessing property rights and forest conditions in two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(5 reference statements)
3
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 19 studies that made comparisons with private regimes, 6 studies reported negative outcomes [35] and 12 studies reported undetermined outcomes (i.e. study reported both positive and negative outcome measurements) [39,44]. In addition, Fig.…”
Section: Results From Forest Resource Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 19 studies that made comparisons with private regimes, 6 studies reported negative outcomes [35] and 12 studies reported undetermined outcomes (i.e. study reported both positive and negative outcome measurements) [39,44]. In addition, Fig.…”
Section: Results From Forest Resource Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 16 studies reported enough baseline data [36,40,41,44,46,47,51,55,56] and these were classified into poor, fair and good conditions (Fig. 12).…”
Section: Resource Baseline Condition As a Contextual Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 100 published papers explore the relationship between preexisting tenure security and/or tenure type on the one hand and forest cover on the other (20,21,(33)(34)(35). Two recent meta-analyses conclude that, in general, preexisting tenure security is associated with lower rates of forest cover change regardless of the form of tenure (36,37).…”
Section: Evidence Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Untuk menilai kesiapan kelembagaan, maka hanya dua komponen terkait kelembagaan yang dirujuk yaitu 1) Autonomy: yaitu masyarakat secara mandiri mampu untuk merumuskan aturan terkait pengelolaan hutan lestari; 2) Prior Organizational Experience: yaitu di mana masyarakat telah memiliki pengetahuan dan kemampuan berorganisasi. Kedua indikator tersebut juga sesuai dengan pendapat Gibson, Lehoucq, & Wlliams (2002) yang menyatakan bahwa proyek-proyek masyarakat dan REDD+ juga membutuhkan kemampuan untuk menegakkan peraturan untuk mengelola hutan secara efektif.…”
Section: B Kesiapan Kelembagaan DI Tingkatunclassified