2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does foreign direct investment promote institutional development in Africa?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth in outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) by emerging market multinational enterprises (EMMNEs) has challenged the prevailing notion that a higher quality of governance in the recipient country equates with higher levels of FDI, even leading to questions about the effect of EMMNEs' FDI on the formal institutions in the least developed countries (Fon, Filippaios, Stoian, & Lee, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth in outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) by emerging market multinational enterprises (EMMNEs) has challenged the prevailing notion that a higher quality of governance in the recipient country equates with higher levels of FDI, even leading to questions about the effect of EMMNEs' FDI on the formal institutions in the least developed countries (Fon, Filippaios, Stoian, & Lee, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2018; Ramasamy and Yeung 2020; Shao 2020; Zheng and van Vliet 2018); (ii) the sustainability of affiliated investments (Bandiera and Tsiropoulos 2020; Carmody 2020); (iii) its ability to bring about developmental gains in recipient countries (Chen 2021; Fon et al . 2021); and (iv) its environmental effects (Chernysheva et al . 2019; Liu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature on the BRI has emphasized its role as a diplomatic tool and presented it as a corollary of China's aspirations to expand its global influence and its ability to exert power over and extract resources from different territories (Flint and Zhu 2019;Jakim ów 2019;Katsumata and Nagata 2019;Kim 2019;Rana 2019;Sneddon 2015;Sparks 2018). The recent literature has increasingly discussed the political economy of the BRI in terms of (i) Chinese OFDI (Liu et al 2018;Ramasamy and Yeung 2020;Shao 2020;Zheng and van Vliet 2018); (ii) the sustainability of affiliated investments (Bandiera and Tsiropoulos 2020;Carmody 2020); (iii) its ability to bring about developmental gains in recipient countries (Chen 2021;Fon et al 2021); and (iv) its environmental effects (Chernysheva et al 2019;Liu et al 2020;Nedopil 2021). While China-led infrastructure construction within the global South is viewed as an opportunity for industrial development by some (Arrfat 2020, 204), others have critiqued the BRI for failing to bring about 'local capacity building and knowledge transfer' (Khalili 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will provide income for the state through taxes, and of course with the increase in production volume it can attract the attention of foreign investors to invest in the country. The entry of foreign investors can be utilized by domestic producers to collaborate either through direct investment or investment through companies that already exist in the country (Fon et al, 2021). Foreign Direct Investment (Foreign Direct Investment) is generally considered as an instrument of how to stimulate the economic growth of any country, for that the governments of countries are trying to encourage the entry of foreign direct investment by various steps (Szkorupová, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%