2009
DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000343913.30802.6f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Experience in Colposcopy Improve Identification of High Grade Abnormalities?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
15
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we think that the training before the study was sufficient to have this unfamiliarity resolved. Furthermore, the performance of the colposcopists in this study is similar to that typically reported for colposcopy, 1,[3][4][5][6] indicating that the performance of conventional colposcopy using the DSI colposcope is not hindered by the device itself.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, we think that the training before the study was sufficient to have this unfamiliarity resolved. Furthermore, the performance of the colposcopists in this study is similar to that typically reported for colposcopy, 1,[3][4][5][6] indicating that the performance of conventional colposcopy using the DSI colposcope is not hindered by the device itself.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…1,[3][4][5][6] The addition of DSI to conventional colposcopy therefore results in an almost 50% increase in sensitivity; from 55% to 79% by DSI colposcopy alone if all preconditions for a optimal examination are met, and to 80% in combination with conventional colposcopy regardless of the circumstances or individual user adequacy. Hence, the higher sensitivity of DSI colposcopy alone or in combination with conventional colposcopy improves the detection of high-grade cervical lesions significantly and guides cervical sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baum ME, et al and Homesley HD, et al also reported a non-significant difference in agreement and correlation in each year of residency training (Homesley et al, 1985;Baum et al, 2006). Bekkers, et al also concluded in their study that level of experience did not improve colposcopic performance (Bekkers et al, 2008). However, we agreed that a more structured colposcopic training program and re-evaluation system may be more beneficial for the resident and all colposcopists.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…Unfortunately the sensitivity of colposcopy to detect high-grade cervical lesions is low, around 55%. [3][4][5][6] It has previously been shown by us and others that the sensitivity of colposcopy can be significantly improved when the dynamic spectral imaging (DSI) colposcope is used. 7,8 Recently in a sub-study of the ALTS trial (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]-lowgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL] Triage Study) 9 Jeronimo et al 10 observed that HPV16 positive (HPV16 + ) lesions produce more defined visual abnormalities at colposcopy than lesions caused by other hrHPV types, regardless of final histological diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%