2019
DOI: 10.1111/afe.12334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does composition of tropical agricultural landscape affect parasitoid diversity and their host–parasitoid interactions?

Abstract: 1 The expansion of agricultural fields is the main cause of landscape simplification and changes in the composition and configuration of landscapes. These landscape changes influence pests and their natural enemies, and may influence their interaction and the biological control services to which they contribute. However, the effects of landscape composition can vary between region and insect species. 2 The present study was conducted on cucumber plants in 16 different sites of varying landscape composition in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Syrphids, parasitoids, predatory wasps, and staphylinids were more abundant in fields surrounded by landscapes with higher edge densities, and these configurational effects dwarfed the effects of the amount of seminatural habitat. The same has been found for insectivorous wasps in wheat [17], parasitoids in cucumber [18], and coccinellids in rice [19]. In North America, edge density appears to have similar effects on aphid predators in cereal crops, with more chrysomelids, nabids, and overall higher aphid enemy richness in fine-grained landscapes [15,16].…”
Section: Grain Sizesupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Syrphids, parasitoids, predatory wasps, and staphylinids were more abundant in fields surrounded by landscapes with higher edge densities, and these configurational effects dwarfed the effects of the amount of seminatural habitat. The same has been found for insectivorous wasps in wheat [17], parasitoids in cucumber [18], and coccinellids in rice [19]. In North America, edge density appears to have similar effects on aphid predators in cereal crops, with more chrysomelids, nabids, and overall higher aphid enemy richness in fine-grained landscapes [15,16].…”
Section: Grain Sizesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We need more information on how grain size affects herbivores, rates of suppression, crop damage, and yield. Evidence on herbivores is biased toward aphids ( Figure 1), and variously suggests that finer-grained landscapes can have more [18,19,23] or fewer [27] herbivores, or the results were inconsistent [28] or showed no effects [29,30]. The recent synthesis of data from Europe provides more clarity; pests overwintering outside of fields decreased with edge density, whereas pests overwintering in crop fields were mostly unaffected [14].…”
Section: Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of natural habitats has important contributions for natural enemies (Tscharntke et al 2016), especially to support shelter, alternative hosts, and alternative sources of pollen and nectar (Gagic et al 2011). However, a previous study with cucumber field in Bogor showed a different pattern in that landscape with higher proportions of natural habitats did not influence the abundance of parasitoid wasps and herbivorous insects (Ulina et al 2019). From 12 species of lepidopteran larvae, only 5 species were found to be parasitized by parasitoid wasps ( Table 2).…”
Section: Diversity Of Parasitoid Wasps and Lepidopteran Larvae From Lmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This research was conducted in agricultural landscapes located in six villages in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia (Figure 1). The characteristics of agricultural landscapes in Bogor consist of patchy croplands and the presence of semi-natural habitats (Ulina et al 2019). In each village, a crop field was selected with the distance between crop fields in other villages being at least 2 km apart in order to avoid overlapping landscapes and spatial autocorrelation (Tischendorf and Fahrig 2000).…”
Section: Study Area and Landscape Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation