2009
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do managed clinical networks improve quality of diabetes care? Evidence from a retrospective mixed methods evaluation

Abstract: Delivering better care to whole populations across organisational and professional boundaries required sustained work over long periods, and at all levels of the system of care. Past network focus on clinical collaboration has been effective at improving clinical process and outcome, and the network is now prioritising work with managers and patients to support future redesign.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An independent evaluation of a managed clinical network in Scotland suggested improvements in processes and outcomes for patients with diabetes after its implementation. 26 The evaluation also suggested that the lack of patient and managerial involvement during the network's formative years was problematic, and a key to its success was effective engagement across specialties. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An independent evaluation of a managed clinical network in Scotland suggested improvements in processes and outcomes for patients with diabetes after its implementation. 26 The evaluation also suggested that the lack of patient and managerial involvement during the network's formative years was problematic, and a key to its success was effective engagement across specialties. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The evaluation also suggested that the lack of patient and managerial involvement during the network's formative years was problematic, and a key to its success was effective engagement across specialties. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional managed networks, based around specialist services which provides clinical expertise, ongoing support and education for local providers within their area, have been successful in improving outcomes in diabetes, epilepsy and cystic fibrosis, amongst others 9 10. Neonatal care has been transformed through neonatal networks, and, importantly, the willingness of clinicians to provide data through the comprehensive national neonatal audit programme for benchmarking and service improvement as well as academic and health services research 11.…”
Section: Variation In Effective (Or High Value) Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 However, evidence for their success is largely anecdotal and experiential 2,3 , or focused on individual clinical areas. [4][5][6] The science to support clinical network design has not kept pace with networks' rapid operational development. 7 We define 'clinical networks' as networks of clinicians and consumers that aim to improve clinical care and service delivery using a collegial approach to agree on and implement a range of strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%