Do Judges’ Delegations Affect Judicial Performance? A Transition Economy Evidence

Staszkiewicz, Piotr; Morawska, Sylwia; Banasik, Przemysław; Witkowski, Bartosz; Staszkiewicz, Richard

doi:10.1080/0098261x.2020.1843092

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The economic controls perform reasonably well in the model and check the robustness [54,55]. We ran three regressions separately, each of the regression showing the implication of active citizenship defined with variables presented in previous section in relation with main elements of the society based on which the economic growth and a sustainable development are achieved.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Fiscal Responsibility through Active Citizenship for Governance Quality

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Active citizenship emphasizes the importance of understanding its added value to fiscal responsibility and governance quality for economic and sustainable growth. Firstly, the paper aims to review issues in the literature pertinent to the debate on the role and the characterization of active citizenship. Secondly, using a linear regression model, we provide new evidence on the relationship between active citizenship, on the one hand, and fiscal responsibility, government quality, and economic growth, on the other hand, for the 27 European Union countries, over the period from 2006 to 2019. Our results highlight that active citizenship determines a more responsible and efficient activity of government based on fiscal responsibility, contributing to economic growth and sustainable development.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Fiscal Responsibility through Active Citizenship for Governance Quality

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Of the work that does exist, the far majority assesses the impact of contextual pressures. In general, this work tends to highlight resources and management structures (Palumbo et al, 2013; Staszkiewicz et al, 2020; Voigt & El‐Bialy, 2016) but some country‐specific evaluations also point to the impact of political and social environments (Goelzhauser, 2012 [addressing US courts]; Beer, 2006 [addressing Mexican courts]). Although important, this work has generally ignored the likely more proximate impact of psychological considerations.…”

Section: Public Organizational Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy as psychological predictors of judicial officer performance

Hamm,

Ropp,

Witwer

et al. 2023

Public Administration Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current work explores three potential facilitators of judicial performance. Participants in a state‐wide survey of judicial officers (response rate = 33.9%) completed self‐report measures of self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy as well as subjectively perceived performance. Objective performance data collected by the state court administrative office was then merged with the survey data. Latent variable analysis confirmed the three predictor constructs’ separability and, although all four concepts were correlated, self‐efficacy was the sole independent predictor of subjective performance. An unplanned mediation analysis suggested significant indirect effects of self‐legitimacy and prosocial impact on subjectively assessed performance through self‐efficacy. Regarding objective performance, self‐efficacy emerged as the only significant correlate or predictor. The research therefore empirically demonstrates the empirical distinctiveness of self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy and provides some exploratory support for a causal model whereby self‐efficacy provides the proximal impact on performance but is itself facilitated by prosocial impact and self‐legitimacy.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

show abstract

Measuring the prestige of administrative courts

Stachowiak-Kudła

Kudła

2022

Qual Quant

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the citation practices of the provincial administrative courts in Poland in a sample of judgments issued in the years 2009–2016. The analysis strives to assess the factors affecting the use of other court citations and the prestige of provincial courts manifested in the higher citations of their verdicts. The methods used involve logistic and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions on the set of factors relating to court circuit characteristics, the performance of courts, the features of cases and the efficiency of the administration in a given province. The results indicate that, out of sixteen courts, there is only one provincial administrative court with high prestige. The number of citations is higher for more populated circuits and decreases with the number of employed judges in a court. While small courts cite more they are also more frequently cited than larger ones.

show abstract

Do Judges’ Delegations Affect Judicial Performance? A Transition Economy Evidence

Cited by 4 publications

References 21 publications

Exploring the Fiscal Responsibility through Active Citizenship for Governance Quality

Exploring the Fiscal Responsibility through Active Citizenship for Governance Quality

Self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy as psychological predictors of judicial officer performance

Measuring the prestige of administrative courts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About