Do infrastructure development and urbanisation lead to rural-urban income inequality Evidence from some Asian countries

Mishra, Amritkant; Agarwal, Amba

doi:10.1504/ijse.2019.099054

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The data of the Air pollution index, which is represented by average AQI of the year 2021 which was further categories in four regions East, West, North and South, this is extracted from open website of Central Pollution Control Board available on https://app.cpcbccr.com/AQI_India_Iframe/ . Such data has been taken by various studies related to the above theme (24,25).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Urban Environmental Quality, Residential Satisfaction, and Personality on Quality of Life Among Residents of Delhi/NCR

Chukkali¹,

Rastogi²,

Mishra³

et al. 2022

ECS Trans.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental quality and sustainability seek to preserve, enhance, and protect our environmental resources that directly aim at providing an amicable quality of life and sustainable development for the upcoming generations. Considering the hazardous environmental urban quality in Delhi NCR, air pollution is the topmost factor deteriorating the health of the population in general. The urban air database by WHO reports Delhi exceeding the maximum PM10 limit by almost 10-times at 292 μg/m3. Noticing that an individual's surroundings have an enormous value in human lives, the study aimed at understanding the impact of urban environmental quality, residential satisfaction, and personality on the quality of life among residents of Delhi NCR. In addition, we also track the environmental world views to attitudes on pro-environmental behavior in understanding sustainability. The results from the SEM model indicated that one index rise in RESS lead to a fall in quality of life by 0.029 point value, whereas one index rise in personality could enhance the quality of life by 0.15 point value. Pro-environmental behaviors and urban environmental factors did not showcase any significant impact on the quality of life.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Urban Environmental Quality, Residential Satisfaction, and Personality on Quality of Life Among Residents of Delhi/NCR

Chukkali¹,

Rastogi²,

Mishra³

et al. 2022

ECS Trans.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Multiple empirical analyses have completely disregarded the positive feedback or favorable impact of REC on economic growth. For instance, (Marques and Fuinhas, 2012; Ocal and Aslan, 2013; Mishra and Agarwal, 2019) advocated that transforming from nonrenewable resources of energy production to innovative technology for the generation of renewable sources could lead surge cost of production, which finally would lead to unfavorable impact on economic growth. Additionally, Astariz and Iglesias (2015) concluded that pulverized fuel technology is most efficient and comparatively cheaper than green energy sources.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green energy, carbon emission and economic prosperity; an evidence of global perspective

Mishra¹,

Alavi

2022

IJESM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Globally, the paucity of conventional energy sources has created an unprecedented increase in demand for green energy. Continuous dependency on conventional energy sources has given rise to several undesirable environmental consequences. In the 20th century, the international forum pondered about the development and uses of green energy, which commenced with the realization of global warming and the signing of the Kyoto Protocol agreement. This study aims to divulge the nexus between green energy, carbon emissions and economic prosperity from a global perspective. The study has been conducted by considering panel data of 35 global economies from 1971 to 2019. Design/methodology/approach To calibrate the uses of green energy, this study dwells upon the ratio between green energy consumption and total energy use. These instrumental variables have been widely acknowledged and accepted by several empirical analysis done in the past (Lin and Moubarak, 2014; Shahbaz et al., 2015). This research specifically uses the emission of carbon dioxide in a million tons as an instrumental variable of environmental degradation, which has been disregarded by all-preceding researchers from a global perspective. Additionally, this study also considers real gross domestic product value in terms of US$ (2010 constant price) as an indicator of economic prosperity. The same has been contemplated by an ample number of empirical research studies conducted previously. Thus, the authors adopted the panel autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) technique to achieve this research objectives; and to tackle the issue of contemporaneous correlation, the authors applied cross-sectional augmented autoregressive distributed lag (CSARDL) of common correlated effect pooled mean group (CCEPMG). Findings The results of panel ARDL analysis reveal that in the long-run, real gross domestic product (GDP) leads to carbon emission, whereas green energy uses do not have a substantial effect on the reduction of carbon emission. However, in the short-run, green energy consumption seems definitely helpful for combating carbon emission, while real GDP instigates carbon emission. This study effectively fortifies the notion of a trade-off between ecological pollution and economic prosperity. The empirical results of the Granger Causality test produce evidence of unidirectional causality from carbon emission to green energy uses and from real GDP to carbon emission in the panel countries Research limitations/implications First, decisive corollaries of the conclusions drawn above have been made purely on the basis of a comprehensive investigation of 35 global economies. However, there is the scope for inclusive examination by considering more modern economies simultaneously. Second, this paper studied the potential impact of the uses of green energy and real GDP on carbon emission. Notably, the inference of this study has been grounded on three relevant variables, whereas there are possibilities that such an investigation could possibly be extended by considering other instrumental variables of environmental pollution. Originality/value A significant number of studies in the past have investigated the connection between renewable energy consumption (REC) and economic growth. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, none have looked to investigate the nexus between REC, economic prosperity and environmental sustainability simultaneously, specifically from the global perspective. Hence, this study intends to widen the prevailing perception of the emerging context above in two ways; first, by reconnoitering the effect of REC on environmental consequences and economic progress simultaneously, which has not been accomplished in extant literature. Second, the authors also strive to gradually augment the comprehensive analysis by expanding the study from a global perspective and by constructing the panel data of developing and advanced economies.

show abstract

“…Penelitian Mishra & Agarwal (2019) mengkaji hubungan antara pembangunan infrastruktur, urbanisasi, dan ketimpangan pendapatan desa-kota dalam perspektif Asia dengan menggunakan data panel dari sembilan negara Asia untuk periode spesifik 1991 hingga 2016. Hasil dari panel dinamik kuadrat terkecil menyatakan bahwa beberapa proxi pembangunan infrastruktur seperti tenaga listrik, transportasi dan telekomunikasi mengarah pada potensi pengurangan perbedaan pendapatan desa-kota, sementara di sisi lain, akses air dan sanitasi meningkat sama.…”

Section: Pemerataan Infrastruktur Bagian Dari Redistributionunclassified

Inequality, Economic Growth, and Redistribution; Literature Review

Hidayat

Karimi

2020

JAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Economists have long believed that economic growth will solve the problem of inequality and poverty. For decades, the question of whether and how inequality affects growth has been the subject of open debate in the academic world. In the same section, the redistribution which is considered part of the equalization step also has positive and negative impacts on economic growth. This paper presents a literature review consisting of several sections including: 1) literature review on the relationship between inequality and growth; 2) the relationship between redistribution and growth; 3) even distribution of infrastructure is part of the form of redistribution.

show abstract

Do infrastructure development and urbanisation lead to rural-urban income inequality Evidence from some Asian countries

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Impact of Urban Environmental Quality, Residential Satisfaction, and Personality on Quality of Life Among Residents of Delhi/NCR

Impact of Urban Environmental Quality, Residential Satisfaction, and Personality on Quality of Life Among Residents of Delhi/NCR

Green energy, carbon emission and economic prosperity; an evidence of global perspective

Inequality, Economic Growth, and Redistribution; Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About