1976
DOI: 10.1093/jee/69.1.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and Seasonal Biology of Phyllophaga crinita in the Texas High Plains12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Essa característica é comum para larvas de melolontídeos (Fig 2) (Teetes et al 1976, Oliveira et al 1996, Silva & Grützmacher 1996, Salvadori 2000. A razão de crescimento média da cápsula cefálica de L. suturalis foi de 1,58 mm (Tabela 1), evidenciando a mudança de ínstar do inseto, conforme estabelecido pela regra proposta por Dyar para lagartas, mas também utilizada para outras ordens de insetos (Parra & Haddad 1989).…”
Section: Número De íNstaresunclassified
“…Essa característica é comum para larvas de melolontídeos (Fig 2) (Teetes et al 1976, Oliveira et al 1996, Silva & Grützmacher 1996, Salvadori 2000. A razão de crescimento média da cápsula cefálica de L. suturalis foi de 1,58 mm (Tabela 1), evidenciando a mudança de ínstar do inseto, conforme estabelecido pela regra proposta por Dyar para lagartas, mas também utilizada para outras ordens de insetos (Parra & Haddad 1989).…”
Section: Número De íNstaresunclassified
“…There is no common name for this species. In Texas, the larvae have been reported feeding in rangeland pasture, ornamental turf, sugarcane, grain sorghum, cotton, and wheat, as well as corn, parsley, and cabbage (Reinhard 1940;Teetes 1973Teetes , 1976Huffman et al 1976;Huffman and Harding 1980). P. crinita larvae are also serious pests in Mexico (Rodriguez-del-Bosque 1984, 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, on the second release date, although approximately 82% of females were released, only males were recaptured, con rming that males were more active on this date, perhaps in search of mating partners. Studies of P. crinita (Burmeister) have shown greater activity of males than females, which are less attracted to light traps and y short distances to oviposits (Teetes et al 1976;Stone 1986). We observed that females of P. capillata, however, are able to y at least 150 m, a distance much greater than that reached by females of a congener, P. cuyabana, which in Brazil reached 20 m (Oliveira and Garcia 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%