2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed secondary voltage control for autonomous microgrids under additive measurement noises and time delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x^(k + 1) = Ax(k) + Bû(k) (12) where x ∈ ℝ n denotes the state vector of the model and û ∈ ℝ m denotes the control vector of the model. A and B are the constant system matrices with appropriate dimensions.…”
Section: Stability Analysis and Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…x^(k + 1) = Ax(k) + Bû(k) (12) where x ∈ ℝ n denotes the state vector of the model and û ∈ ℝ m denotes the control vector of the model. A and B are the constant system matrices with appropriate dimensions.…”
Section: Stability Analysis and Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposes a secondary control scheme that ensures reliability and quality of power supply. More recently, several notable works on the distributed or communication-based secondary control have been reported [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Considering the effect of uncertain communication topologies, a stochastic distributed secondary control strategy is implemented in [10] to achieve mean-square synchronisation for frequency/voltage restoration in AC microgrids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Unlike [22], [26], [35], our control approach ensures the finite-time stability of the MG, thus allowing both to speed-up the synchronization process to the reference behaviour despite the presence of sensitive loads and communication latencies and to guarantee prescribed transient performances; • Differently from [22], [35], by exploiting Lyapunov-Krasovskii theory and Finite-Time stability tools, we provide a delay-dependent control gain tuning procedure, expressed as set of LMI, whose solution allows finding the voltage controller gain and state trajectories bound as function of the upper bound for the communication time-delay; this guarantees a certain stability margin w.r.t. sudden packet losses, which can be modeled as hard delays; • Differently from [22], [28], [32], [35], an extensive simulation analysis is carried out by considering a practical case-of-study of the IEEE 14-bus Test system, where no overlapping between electrical and communication layers is considered. Moreover, the worst case scenarios of hard load variations and plug-and-play of DG units are also discussed in order to confirm the robustness of the proposed control approach with respect to sudden changing into the surrounding environment; • The validation of the proposed networked-based finitetime delayed control action also in the IEEE 30 bus test system with more distributed energy resources corroborates its applicability on larger networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, technical requirements of grid codes for integrating renewable energies have not been considered. In [16], the authors target secondary voltage applications of a 100% inverter-based microgrid showing the effect of communication delays. In [15] and [16], inverter based secondary voltage control is distributed and controlling buses, which include distributed generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%