“…• Unlike [22], [26], [35], our control approach ensures the finite-time stability of the MG, thus allowing both to speed-up the synchronization process to the reference behaviour despite the presence of sensitive loads and communication latencies and to guarantee prescribed transient performances; • Differently from [22], [35], by exploiting Lyapunov-Krasovskii theory and Finite-Time stability tools, we provide a delay-dependent control gain tuning procedure, expressed as set of LMI, whose solution allows finding the voltage controller gain and state trajectories bound as function of the upper bound for the communication time-delay; this guarantees a certain stability margin w.r.t. sudden packet losses, which can be modeled as hard delays; • Differently from [22], [28], [32], [35], an extensive simulation analysis is carried out by considering a practical case-of-study of the IEEE 14-bus Test system, where no overlapping between electrical and communication layers is considered. Moreover, the worst case scenarios of hard load variations and plug-and-play of DG units are also discussed in order to confirm the robustness of the proposed control approach with respect to sudden changing into the surrounding environment; • The validation of the proposed networked-based finitetime delayed control action also in the IEEE 30 bus test system with more distributed energy resources corroborates its applicability on larger networks.…”