2003
DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2003.1209593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed mechanisms for quality of service in wireless LANs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One strategy that could be deployed is to specify different contention windows for different devices based on a negotiation with the RA. While this is similar to some of the QoS approaches in WiFi [17], the devices that employ QoS do so on their own, without any coordination with an RA. Thus, the resulting behavior may fail to be as desired.…”
Section: B Case Ii: Ieee 80211 Protocol Tweaksmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…One strategy that could be deployed is to specify different contention windows for different devices based on a negotiation with the RA. While this is similar to some of the QoS approaches in WiFi [17], the devices that employ QoS do so on their own, without any coordination with an RA. Thus, the resulting behavior may fail to be as desired.…”
Section: B Case Ii: Ieee 80211 Protocol Tweaksmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is usually achieved by adapting the contention window and/or the initial back-off of the CSMA/CA mechanism. Overviews of these approaches are presented in [5] and [6]. Rate and admission control [7], [8], [9] may be used with contentionbased protocols to handle congestion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to support QoS for real-time traffic on WLANs, these issues need to be resolved. Various research proposals [3,6,7,8] address to solve these issues, and attempt to support QoS in IEEE 802.11 based WLANs. IEEE 802.11e standard [3] defines Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the implementation is not economical. Schemes proposed in [6,7,8] suggest either assigning priority to incoming real-time and non real-time traffic or service differentiation using multiple queues and hence cannot support the QoS requirements of voice traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%