2015
DOI: 10.1656/058.014.0208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinctions in Pitcher Morphology and Prey Capture of the Okefenokee Variety within the Carnivorous Plant SpeciesSarracenia minor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might directly impact the resulting plant microbiomes based on the bacteria associated with the incoming prey. Ants and other Hymenoptera are the insects most commonly attracted to Sarracenia pitcher plants ( 3 , 24 , 25 ); S. minor , specifically, seems to be an ant specialist ( 26 , 27 ). However, the microbiomes of ants tend to vary depending on their geographic location ( 28 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might directly impact the resulting plant microbiomes based on the bacteria associated with the incoming prey. Ants and other Hymenoptera are the insects most commonly attracted to Sarracenia pitcher plants ( 3 , 24 , 25 ); S. minor , specifically, seems to be an ant specialist ( 26 , 27 ). However, the microbiomes of ants tend to vary depending on their geographic location ( 28 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus analysed with general mixed models the total number of prey individuals trapped by pitchers, the number of flying prey individuals, the number of bees, moths, Diptera (flies, midges and mosquitoes), wasps (solitary, social and parasitoid wasps) and ants trapped by pitchers as dependent variables, testing taxon as an explanatory fixed variable and sampling day and plant identity as random variables. As the four taxa differed significantly in pitcher length ( S1 Fig ), which was likely to influence the number of prey [ 36 , 40 , 41 ], we corrected prey number by pitcher length in the analyses and considered this variable as a density (number of individuals / pitcher length). Density was square-root transformed to achieve normality of residuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large part of the differences in the amounts of flying and terrestrial insects trapped in pitchers can be explained by differences in VOC emission [ 20 ]. In Sarracenia , morphology has hitherto been mainly invoked to explain these differences in prey capture [ 36 , 40 , 41 ]. But Ellison and Gotelli reported only few differences in prey spectra among Sarracenia species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pitcher's shape, size, and color are important in attracting prey (Gaume et al 2016;Peng and Clarke 2015;Stephens et al 2015). However, Buch et al (2015) and Gilbert et al 2018 reported no relationship between pitcher size and color and prey capture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%