2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct functional connectivity of the hippocampus during semantic and phonemic fluency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors suggested that the involvement of left hippocampus in semantic information processing result from use of strategies relying on autobiographic processes and episodic recollections optimizing semantic memory functioning [39,4143]. Recent studies have highlighted a selective recruitment of the hippocampus in verbal fluency tasks, particularly in semantic ones [38,39,4446]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors suggested that the involvement of left hippocampus in semantic information processing result from use of strategies relying on autobiographic processes and episodic recollections optimizing semantic memory functioning [39,4143]. Recent studies have highlighted a selective recruitment of the hippocampus in verbal fluency tasks, particularly in semantic ones [38,39,4446]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81 Therefore, although VF has traditionally been viewed as a 'frontal' function, it involves a memory network, and a recent fMRI study found hippocampal connectivity with a semantic network during semantic (category), but not phonetic (letter), fluency. 82 VF is strongly impaired by ECT, whereas WM is relatively unaffected by ECT. 17 Semantic VF is therefore a possible functional probe of the associative memory network, which includes the hippocampus, and is sensitive to the effects of ECT, whereas WM tasks appear more restricted to a cortical network that is less affected.…”
Section: Assessment Of Frontal Cortex Function: the Use Of Near Inframentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Here, we did not individualize these different subdomains of apathy, but we found that apathetic iNPH patients improved their STV after CSF tapping in a specific dual‐task condition (walking and enumerating animal names) that is associated with executive functioning—this better improvement was also found for gait speed, but not for stride time and stride length. Interestingly, verbal fluency tasks—phonemic and categorical—are associated with separate frontal networks, and unlike phonemic verbal fluency, bilateral hippocampi are selectively involved in the brain networks that supports categorical verbal fluency . CSF tapping decreases the surrounding pressure around the ventricles not only in the frontal regions but also in the hippocampi, specifically involved in higher level of gait control—hippocampal volume has been associated with gait performance in older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%