Dissecting the voice: Health professions students' perceptions of instructor age and gender in an online environment and the impact on evaluations for faculty

Abstract

Gender and age bias is well-documented in academia with many studies demonstrating bias in students' evaluations of instructors. Failure of an instructor to meet gender or age-based expectations can translate to lower scores or negative comments on evaluations. While there is some evidence of bias in students' evaluations of online instructors, current studies have not fully examined the relationship between bias and instructor vocal characteristics. First-year dental students at two institutions were randomly assigned one of four videos on spinal cord anatomy to view. Videos contained identical content but were narrated by individuals of different gender and age (younger man, younger woman, older man, older woman). Students completed a content-based prequiz, watched the video, completed a postquiz, and answered a questionnaire evaluating the video and instructor. Students at Institution A rated the younger man and younger woman highest for nearly every evaluation category. At Institution B students rated the older man and younger woman highest. Results reveal that the older woman's voice received the lowest rankings for nearly every question in both samples. This report confirms the presence of gender and age bias in student evaluations of instructors in an online environment and demonstrates that bias may surface in response to vocal characteristics. Bias may impact older women more significantly than other groups. Differences in results from Institution A and Institution B suggest that factors affecting student perceptions of instructors, and the roles that gender and age bias may play in student evaluations, are complex and may be contextual. Anat Sci Educ 9: 537-544. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.

Negative Life Events and Time Perspective Among Adolescents

“…The lack of control of the lexical properties of the auditory Stroop task used in the current study may partially explain the unforeseen finding that participants' responses to the male voices were significantly faster than their responses to the female voices, independent of occupation pairing. Prior research on the perception of voices has indicated that people are sensitive to voice characteristics and make important evaluations based on voice qualities associated with gender (Doubleday & Lee, 2016). For example, it has been found that voice based biases favoring men can affect how health professionals are evaluated.…”

Tutor`s Roles and Performances in Modern Human Anatomy Course Supported by Virtual Technology

“…Functions of the tutors are work as facilitators, coaches, consultants or resource people who provide intellectual guidance for student learning (Meedya, Moroney, Nielsen, & Najafi Bokat, 2019). Different authors argue that the new digital roles of tutors may be more complicated than in traditional practical classes (Doubleday & Lee, 2016). The roles may be intricately related with each other because one issue can cut across two or more areas (Sweet, 2017).…”

Should Student Evaluation of Teaching Play a Significant Role in the Formal Assessment of Dental Faculty? Two Viewpoints

“…Numerous studies have also demonstrated that subjective biases (gender, racial, age) significantly impact SET ratings, even for “objective” categories, such as speed of grading 31 or organization. 32 It is disturbing that the mere perception of being taught by a female instructor could result in lower SET ratings. We cannot ignore these biases when we are aware that they exist, since it is not possible for administrators to account for such biases adequately when considering SETs in the formal review of a faculty member.…”

“…SETs were found to be significantly biased against female faculty members in several studies. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] While gender inequalities in SETs have been described since the mid-1970s, surprisingly little has changed with regards to gender bias. 30 Nevertheless, SETs continue to be used today as objective measures of teaching performance and to determine faculty promotion and tenure.…”

“…Similar findings were observed in another study examining the influence of age and gender biases on SETs for online courses. 32 In that study, first-year dental students at two dental schools were randomly assigned to watch one of four videos. Each video was narrated by one of four instructors (young male, young female, older male, older female).…”