Should Student Evaluation of Teaching Play a Significant Role in the Formal Assessment of Dental Faculty? Two Viewpoints

Abstract

Student evaluation of teaching (SET) is often used in the assessment of faculty members’ job performance and promotion and tenure decisions, but debate over this use of student evaluations has centered on the validity, reliability, and application of the data in assessing teaching performance. Additionally, the fear of student criticism has the potential of influencing course content delivery and testing measures. This Point/Counterpoint article reviews the potential utility of and controversy surrounding the use of SETs in the formal assessment of dental school faculty. Viewpoint 1 supports the view that SETs are reliable and should be included in those formal assessments. Proponents of this opinion contend that SETs serve to measure a school’s effectiveness in support of its core mission, are valid measures based on feedback from the recipients of educational delivery, and provide formative feedback to improve faculty accountability to the institution. Viewpoint 2 argues that SETs should not be used for promotion and tenure decisions, asserting that higher SET ratings do not correlate with improved student learning. The advocates of this viewpoint contend that faculty members may be influenced to focus on student satisfaction rather than pedagogy, resulting in grade inflation. They also argue that SETs are prone to gender and racial biases and that SET results are frequently misinterpreted by administrators. Low response rates and monotonic response patterns are other factors that compromise the reliability of SETs.

Construction Scheme of Quantitative Assessment of College Teachers’ Performance Based on Big Data Analysis

“…Performance is a very important part of business management and is a view of how employees are doing as a whole [8,9]. In practical terms, performance can be divided into a variety of different elements depending on the situation and it can be influenced by the individual employee's abilities, resulting in different outcomes [10,11]. Performance appraisal is an effective means to check the quality of employees' work, which is usually measured in years in practice [12].…”

A philosophical analysis of anti‐intellectualism in nursing: Newman’s view of a university education

“…Student evaluation scores represent inadequate measures of effective teaching and may foster racism and sexism (Fan et al, 2019; Uttl et al, 2017). Universities have attempted to alleviate some of these concerns by altering the evaluations’ format (Rowan et al, 2017). Yet, many scholars contend that student evaluations reinforce the hegemony of ‘students as consumers’ and the materialist view of education that further fuels anti‐intellectualism in higher education (Titus, 2008).…”

Distance Learning – the Current Status and Directions for Further Research

“…In general, there are two locations in the assessment of SET utility. Proponents of this method claim that SET are useful in the formal assessment of lecturers: "SETs serve to measure a school's effectiveness in support of its core mission, are valid measures based on feedback from the recipients of educational delivery, and provide formative feedback to improve faculty accountability to the institution" (Rowan, Newness, Tetradis, Prasad, Ko, & Sanchez, 2017, p. 1362. Opponents of this method believe that SETs should not be taken into account when hiring, because higher scores in SET do not correlate with good student performance.…”