2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting the Regulatory Microenvironment of a Large Animal Model of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Evidence of a Negative Prognostic Impact of FOXP3+ T Cells in Canine B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract: The cancer microenvironment plays a pivotal role in oncogenesis, containing a number of regulatory cells that attenuate the anti-neoplastic immune response. While the negative prognostic impact of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the context of most solid tissue tumors is well established, their role in lymphoid malignancies remains unclear. T cells expressing FOXP3 and Helios were documented in the fine needle aspirates of affected lymph nodes of dogs with spontaneous multicentric B cell lymphoma (BCL), proposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,24,25,43 Tumor-infiltrating Tregs have been reported in dogs with osteosarcoma, 5 melanoma, 59 mammary carcinoma, 29,44 seminoma, 28 and multicentric B-cell lymphoma. 39,47 To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe tumor-infiltrating Tregs and their negative prognostic impact in intestinal T-cell lymphoma. Recent studies have also shown that a high Foxp3-positive Treg number is a negative prognostic factor in various types of canine tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,24,25,43 Tumor-infiltrating Tregs have been reported in dogs with osteosarcoma, 5 melanoma, 59 mammary carcinoma, 29,44 seminoma, 28 and multicentric B-cell lymphoma. 39,47 To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe tumor-infiltrating Tregs and their negative prognostic impact in intestinal T-cell lymphoma. Recent studies have also shown that a high Foxp3-positive Treg number is a negative prognostic factor in various types of canine tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent studies have also shown that a high Foxp3-positive Treg number is a negative prognostic factor in various types of canine tumors. 5,29,44,47 Phenotypic and functional analyses have characterized Foxp3-positive Tregs in dogs and demonstrated that they have properties similar to those of human Foxp3-positive Tregs and a potent ability to suppress the proliferation of responder T cells. 31,48 Collectively, these observations suggest that Tregs that migrate into the tumor microenvironment play a significant role in the prognosis of canine cancers, including intestinal small cell lymphoma, by suppressing local antitumor immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in the number of immunosuppressant Treg cells has been associated with a worse prognosis, as demonstrated in dogs with malignant mammary tumors (Carvalho et al, 2016) and dogs with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, in which an increase in the number of Treg cells was observed in animals with shorter survival time (Pinheiro et al, 2014). In the present study, no difference was observed in the survival time between the treatment groups, suggesting that treatment with firocoxib could promote survival times similar to those of traditional CHOP and, thus, be an alternative option of treatment to patients with lymphoma that have comorbidities that contraindicate the use of prednisone, such as diabetes and hyperadrenocorticism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Immune cells pose a significant barrier to the development of cancer, and undergo changes themselves, as cancer cells co-opt the immune response [76,77]. As a result, the tumor influences innate as well as adaptive immune cells to become regulatory, rather than tumoricidal [78,79]. This interplay results in the selection of tumor cells that are invisible to anti-tumor T-cell-mediated destruction, and is central for tumor editing and immune evasion.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Canine Tumor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%