2020
DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v11i1.6088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruptive Innovations: A Case of Solving Hoax Information in Indonesia

Abstract: The research discussed hoax information as an effect of disruptive innovation and how to solve it in society. It applied a qualitative descriptive method with a case study focusing on hoax information of 10 million Chinese workers who came to Indonesia. The research was a library research conducted through various sources of literature and journals. Data analysis was carried out by answering the points that were analyzed and cross-checked to other data sources in order to answer the research questions. It is f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using digital forensic on the internet search engine, URL, and photo from the article to consult it with Indonesian regulation and law is also considered as an effective practical mechanism to confirm whether a news flow is classified as a hoax or not. Further action can also be done to identify the author of a hoax based on linguistic profile shown by bit-level based n-gram analysis on hoax discourse (Gjylbegaj, 2018;Huang & Chen, 2020;Ko et al, 2019;Kumar, 2017;Meinarni & Iswara, 2018;Peng, Choo, & Ashman, 2016;Singh et al, 2020;Sirajudeen, Azmi, & Abubakar, 2017;Tukina, Mozin, & Sanjaya, 2020; Zhang & Ghorbani, I n P r e s s 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using digital forensic on the internet search engine, URL, and photo from the article to consult it with Indonesian regulation and law is also considered as an effective practical mechanism to confirm whether a news flow is classified as a hoax or not. Further action can also be done to identify the author of a hoax based on linguistic profile shown by bit-level based n-gram analysis on hoax discourse (Gjylbegaj, 2018;Huang & Chen, 2020;Ko et al, 2019;Kumar, 2017;Meinarni & Iswara, 2018;Peng, Choo, & Ashman, 2016;Singh et al, 2020;Sirajudeen, Azmi, & Abubakar, 2017;Tukina, Mozin, & Sanjaya, 2020; Zhang & Ghorbani, I n P r e s s 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%