Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2248-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures: influence of delay of surgery on the incidence of open reduction, complications and outcome

Abstract: III (retrospective comparative study).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
20
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of treatment is controversially discussed in the literature. Indeed, delaying treatment of this fracture did not have a significant influence on the rates of open reduction, complication, or overall outcome [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The timing of treatment is controversially discussed in the literature. Indeed, delaying treatment of this fracture did not have a significant influence on the rates of open reduction, complication, or overall outcome [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For those severely displaced supracondylar fractures, there is still a difference in opinion among authors whether utilizing closed reduction or open reduction procedure [10]. Open reduction with percutaneous pinning is an accepted treatment for severely displaced, irreducible fractures of the distal humerus [11][12], which also has several complications like infection, ROM limitation and scarring [13]. There is no research to prove that withier we should have an open procedure for supracondylar humerus fracture with such small fracture anterior to the humerus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common method of treatment of displaced fractures of the corresponding types II, III, and IV according to Gartland/Leitch is closed reduction and percutaneous Kirchner wire stabilization [9, 17]. But sometimes (2,6%) the open fracture reduction is required [18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%