2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersal kernel estimation: A comparison of empirical and modelled particle dispersion in a coastal marine system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hainbucher et al (2004) did not include horizontal eddy diffusion in their ocean mixing model and Liu et al (2012) chose a value of the horizontal eddy diffusion coefficient to be 15 m 2 s À1 . However typical value could be higher, probably of the order of 25 m 2 s À1 (Hrycik et al, 2013) and possibly up to 100 m 2 s À1 especially during storms (Alosairi et al, 2011;Uncles and Torres, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hainbucher et al (2004) did not include horizontal eddy diffusion in their ocean mixing model and Liu et al (2012) chose a value of the horizontal eddy diffusion coefficient to be 15 m 2 s À1 . However typical value could be higher, probably of the order of 25 m 2 s À1 (Hrycik et al, 2013) and possibly up to 100 m 2 s À1 especially during storms (Alosairi et al, 2011;Uncles and Torres, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, phase eddies near isolated reefs and sticky water effects in a reef matrix of reefs also restrict physical dispersal [14,15], and thus help keep the larvae in open waters but in the vicinity of the natal reefs. The probability of a coral larva recruiting to 'sink' reefs downstream of the natal (or 'source') reef is controlled by the dispersal kernel and is typically less than a few per cent [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The behaviour of the larvae alters patterns of recruitment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weighting of the LPDFs between peak and off-peak seasons may be needed to better represent these envelopes. Based on in situ magnetically attractive particles (MAPs), Hrycik et al (2013) showed that the dispersal kernel e-folding scale is sensitive to the diffusivity coefficient. Due to lack of in situ observations, we could not estimate diffusion in our case; rather a harmonic horizontal viscosity coefficient of 100 m 2 s -1 is used, following Marchesiello et al (2003).…”
Section: Potential Larval Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%