2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in park availability, features, and characteristics by social determinants of health within a U.S.–Mexico border urban area

Abstract: Identifying disparities in park availability, features, and characteristics can aid policymakers and citizens in improving the contribution of parks to community health for all.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More parks were found in low compared with medium‐ or high‐income tracts in a US study . Another US study found medium income tertiles to have more parks than high income tertiles, although there was no difference in the number of parks between low and medium or low and high income areas. Two further studies found no difference in the number of green spaces across areas of differing SEP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More parks were found in low compared with medium‐ or high‐income tracts in a US study . Another US study found medium income tertiles to have more parks than high income tertiles, although there was no difference in the number of parks between low and medium or low and high income areas. Two further studies found no difference in the number of green spaces across areas of differing SEP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Two studies, one conducted in Scotland and one in the United States, had U‐shaped results, with both finding fewer recreational facilities in the highest and lowest SEP areas, compared with middle SEP areas. The remaining six papers had mixed findings …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number and size of parks (Cohen et al, 2013), and number of park features (Vaughan et al, 2013) varied little by income in some cities, parks were less prevalent (Powell et al, 2004; Wolch et al, 2005), smaller (Cohen et al, 2012a), or had fewer features (Kamel et al, 2014; Weiss et al, 2011) in other low-income areas. In our study, low-income was associated with greater availability of parks in MD, NC, and NY but in CA and IL, the kernel density of parks and number of feature types were similar by income.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, park features may not be appropriate for all people due to regional and demographic differences in preferences (Loukaitou-Sideris and Sideris, 2010; Payne et al, 2005; Spengler et al, 2011). Moreover, poor condition of features and hazards like broken glass may limit the use of resources in a way that is distinct from proximity (Loukaitou-Sideris and Stieglitz, 2002) and may be more common in low-income and predominately minority areas (Kamel et al, 2014). Future research also should include rural areas, as our study area was urban and suburban.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation