2017
DOI: 10.3280/cad2017-001008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseño de un instrumento de análisis para recursos didácticos patrimoniales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research has focused on qualitative assessments [17,18] and on the analysis of educational resources [19,20] or the evaluation of learning [21]. Elsewhere, the design and validation of measurement instruments from psychometric rigor, such as the Q-Edutage scale, aimed at evaluating the quality of heritage education programs [22], and other solvent construction instruments for the evaluation of programs and learning [23][24][25] have begun to develop a hitherto deficient area. Also, coinciding with the European Commission's demand, studies on accessibility and social inclusion through heritage [26,27] have begun to have an impact, seeking learning for all people, in all contexts and moments of life and with special attention to people with functional diversity [28][29][30].All this research contributes to establishing a systemic, participatory, interactive, complex, and sociocritical vision of heritage and heritage education [31,32], and provides a foundation for the relationship between heritage, citizenship, and the construction of identity [33].Fortunately, classroom experiences with objects and material remains from the past are increasingly frequent, elaborate, and successful [34][35][36][37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has focused on qualitative assessments [17,18] and on the analysis of educational resources [19,20] or the evaluation of learning [21]. Elsewhere, the design and validation of measurement instruments from psychometric rigor, such as the Q-Edutage scale, aimed at evaluating the quality of heritage education programs [22], and other solvent construction instruments for the evaluation of programs and learning [23][24][25] have begun to develop a hitherto deficient area. Also, coinciding with the European Commission's demand, studies on accessibility and social inclusion through heritage [26,27] have begun to have an impact, seeking learning for all people, in all contexts and moments of life and with special attention to people with functional diversity [28][29][30].All this research contributes to establishing a systemic, participatory, interactive, complex, and sociocritical vision of heritage and heritage education [31,32], and provides a foundation for the relationship between heritage, citizenship, and the construction of identity [33].Fortunately, classroom experiences with objects and material remains from the past are increasingly frequent, elaborate, and successful [34][35][36][37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are an improvement in comparison with other previous studies [48,49,52] and, given that the design of the programs which make up the sample corresponds to the most up-to-date designs, this can be interpreted as a gradual improvement in the conceptualisation of educational proposals. However, aspects such as the overall focus of the heritage [53][54][55] or the internal assessment of the programs continue to be aspects in need of improvement, as has already been shown by previous studies [48,49,52,[56][57][58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a significant limitation or deficiency, given that evaluation should be an essential part of any education program. The OEPE has carried out analyses and categorisations of these heritage education programs [4][5][6][7] and has, recently, created a tool for the evaluation of the quality of heritage education programs; the Q-Edutage scale based on evaluation by standards [8]. However, the evaluation of heritage education continues to be present in a limited number of education programs [9].…”
Section: The Evaluation Of Heritage Education Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%