2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of common Mediterranean plant species using field spectroradiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous studies indicate that the East Mediterranean woody species are not necessarily an easy target for classification by remote sensing. Most local vegetation formations are characterized by densely-growing evergreen species, often with similar spectral properties [58][59][60], small intra-annual differences [61] and morphological similarities [62][63][64][65]. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no studies that use high spatial resolution imagery with a limited number of bands for the classification of East Mediterranean common species.…”
Section: Classification Of East Mediterranean Vegetation By Remote Sementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, previous studies indicate that the East Mediterranean woody species are not necessarily an easy target for classification by remote sensing. Most local vegetation formations are characterized by densely-growing evergreen species, often with similar spectral properties [58][59][60], small intra-annual differences [61] and morphological similarities [62][63][64][65]. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no studies that use high spatial resolution imagery with a limited number of bands for the classification of East Mediterranean common species.…”
Section: Classification Of East Mediterranean Vegetation By Remote Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not choose to focus on ideal target species (e.g., large homogeneous canopies with visually distinct phenophases), rather, we examined the local species assembly as-is, including species with challenging spectral and morphological properties with regard to classification by remote sensing [59,60,62,65]; furthermore, after examining the preliminary classification results, we did not see fit to merge or omit species in order to increase overall accuracy.…”
Section: Overhead Data Acquisition and Species Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landsat TM and SPOT sensors provide broadband multispectral data. An example of a narrowband hyperspectral spaceborne sensor is NASA's Earth Observing-1 Mission Hyperion, capable of capturing high resolution images of the earth surface in 220 contiguous spectral bands (Manevski et al, 2011). Broad waveband VIs usually lack diagnostic ability for recognizing a particular biophysical characteristic and thus narrowband indices were developed.…”
Section: Methods Of Vegetation Monitoring Using Remote Sensing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important applications of remote sensing consists in the classification of objects at the earth surface and, in fact, plant communities have been classified and mapped using a wide variety of remote sensors (Manevski et al, 2011). Crop classification is based on the differential spectral behavior of the various crops present in the study area (Xie et al, 2008).…”
Section: Crop Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were found by Kodagoda and Zhang (2010) who found that NIR and VIS had the most bands for discriminating Bidens pilosa L (cobbler's peg) from wheat plants. The NIR and VIS regions also had the lager number bands for discriminating plant species such as Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europea, Pistacia lentiscus, Calicotome villosa and Genista acanthoclada (Manevski et al 2011). Nicolai et al (2007) found that NIR bands were widely useful in measuring the quality of vegetation attributes.…”
Section: Optimal Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%