Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V 2018
DOI: 10.1061/9780784481479.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancy Metrics and Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Soil Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of metrics have been used by researchers to assess differences among dynamic time histories (e.g., accelerations), ranging from a simple vector norm to the Sprague and Geers metric (Geers 1984) which identifies magnitude and phase difference components, along with others. A brief overview of these metrics and some of the associated Zeghal et al (2018). This article uses a new approach (Zeghal et al 2018).…”
Section: Difference Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of metrics have been used by researchers to assess differences among dynamic time histories (e.g., accelerations), ranging from a simple vector norm to the Sprague and Geers metric (Geers 1984) which identifies magnitude and phase difference components, along with others. A brief overview of these metrics and some of the associated Zeghal et al (2018). This article uses a new approach (Zeghal et al 2018).…”
Section: Difference Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief overview of these metrics and some of the associated Zeghal et al (2018). This article uses a new approach (Zeghal et al 2018). The difference d ij between two corresponding acceleration time histories a i ¼ a i (t) and a j ¼ a j (t) of two different test replicas i and j is quantified using a normalized mean squared deviation (MSD):…”
Section: Difference Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%