Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference and Sensitivity Analyses of the LEAP-2017 Experiments

Abstract: The experimental results of LEAP (Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Projects) centrifuge test replicas of a saturated sloping deposit are used to assess the sensitivity of soil accelerations to variability in input motion and soil deposition. A difference metric is used to quantify the dissimilarities between recorded acceleration time histories. This metric is uniquely decomposed in terms of four difference component measures associated with phase, frequency shift, amplitude at 1 Hz, and amplitude of freq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape of the non-circular symbols indicates the experiment being simulated. The grey scale of the points indicates the intensity of the high frequency components (black ¼ negligible high frequency content, white ¼ very significant high frequency content) explored by Goswami et al (2019) to compare experimental data) should be used to quantitatively compare the shape and the amplitude of the trends.…”
Section: -D Comparison Of Simulations To Experimental Regression Surmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of the non-circular symbols indicates the experiment being simulated. The grey scale of the points indicates the intensity of the high frequency components (black ¼ negligible high frequency content, white ¼ very significant high frequency content) explored by Goswami et al (2019) to compare experimental data) should be used to quantitatively compare the shape and the amplitude of the trends.…”
Section: -D Comparison Of Simulations To Experimental Regression Surmentioning
confidence: 99%