1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00451.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse on Method and the History of Discipline: Reflections on Dobson's 1983 Automated Geography∗

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Going back to the early 1980s (Dobson, 1983) the introduction of technology into geography curricula has been debated at every level from methodology (how to integrate it) (Kemp et al, 1992) to epistemology and ontology (how it defines what we need to know and how it may redefine the field itself) (Pickles, 1993;Sheppard, 1993). The coining of the phrase 'geographic information science' was meant to encompass all of these concerns as it considers the fundamental issues of scale, abstraction, boundaries and data quality in addition to software concerns (Kemp et al, 1992;Goodchild, 1993).…”
Section: Problem-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going back to the early 1980s (Dobson, 1983) the introduction of technology into geography curricula has been debated at every level from methodology (how to integrate it) (Kemp et al, 1992) to epistemology and ontology (how it defines what we need to know and how it may redefine the field itself) (Pickles, 1993;Sheppard, 1993). The coining of the phrase 'geographic information science' was meant to encompass all of these concerns as it considers the fundamental issues of scale, abstraction, boundaries and data quality in addition to software concerns (Kemp et al, 1992;Goodchild, 1993).…”
Section: Problem-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As GIS entered the core curriculum of geography programmes through the 1990s, this debate became increasingly sophisticated. For example, a special 'Open Forum' section of The Professional Geographer in 1993 revisited Dobson's 1983 article on automated geography with contributors critiquing the nature of technical training and the impact of GIS in furthering what was seen to be a strongly empiricist agenda (Dobson, 1983(Dobson, , 1993Armstrong, 1993;Cromley, 1993;Goodchild, 1993;Marble & Peuquet, 1993;Monmonier, 1993;Pickles, 1993;Posey, 1993;Shepherd, 1993). The contributions of Pickles and Shepherd to this forum, with their questioning of the nature of scienti c knowledge rendered in a GIS, provided a conceptual foundation for the later suggestion of three perspectives, ranging in a continuum from 'GIS as tool', through 'GIS as tool-making' to 'GIS as science' (Wright et al, 1997a; see also Goodchild, 1985;Pickles's 1997response to Wright et al, 1997a; and a subsequent reply by Wright et al, 1997b).…”
Section: Gis As a Learning Tool For Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peter Taylor initiated the critiques when he suggested that GIS inherited an agenda from the quantitative revolution of 'retreating from knowledge to information ' (1990, p. 212 this retreat as the revenge of the positivists, an accusation that was rendered more bitter by its insinuations of epistemological naivety on the part of GISers. Subsequent critiques of GIS referred to positivism as an epistemological weakness (Smith, 1992;Lake, 1993;Pickles, 1993Pickles, , 1995Sheppard, 1993), and in this they restated a standard feminist scepticism toward objectivity and the neutrality of science (Keller & Longino, 1996). Lake offered that '[p]ositivist assumptions of objectivity, value-neutrality and the ontological separation of subject and object (or of the analyst and the object of analysis) constitute epistemological conditions with political and ethical consequences ' (1993, p. 405).…”
Section: Science Wars Incarnate: Critiques Of Positivism In Gismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It did not necessarily imply that data would be vastly generalised, only that observations are the basis of analysis. For Pickles and other critics, however, positivism implied a relation between science, technology and society, one that many human geographers had been at pains to sideline in the discipline (Pickles, 1993;Sheppard, 1993). Despite some exchange about the meaning of positivism, there was little effort to specify how GIS could be improved or made more rigorous through a shift in epistemology.…”
Section: Science Wars Incarnate: Critiques Of Positivism In Gismentioning
confidence: 99%